Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
An increasing number of mixed-signal design teams are contemplating adding analog behavioral modeling to their repertoire in order to achieve reasonable simulation speeds. Utilizing analog behavioral models can yield simulation performance improvements that can make full chip verification a reality. This approach can be several magnitudes faster than transistor-level; however, the actual performance improvement is greatly dependent on the level of detail in the model, as well as, the language of choice. Analog behavioral models are generally written in one of the languages below:
Verilog-AMS – A derivative of Verilog, it includes analog and mixed-signal extensions in order to define the behavior of analog and mixed-signal systems, providing both continuous-time and event-driven modeling Wreal – An extension of the Verilog-AMS modeling language allowing analog block operation as a real data flow model Verilog-A – An extension of Verilog to describe analog and non-electrical behavior as a continuous-time subset VHDL-AMS (IEEE1076.1) – similar in concept to Verilog-AMS, providing analog and mixed-signal extensions in order to define the behavior of analog and mixed-signal systems
Verilog-AMS – A derivative of Verilog, it includes analog and mixed-signal extensions in order to define the behavior of analog and mixed-signal systems, providing both continuous-time and event-driven modeling
Wreal – An extension of the Verilog-AMS modeling language allowing analog block operation as a real data flow model
Verilog-A – An extension of Verilog to describe analog and non-electrical behavior as a continuous-time subset
VHDL-AMS (IEEE1076.1) – similar in concept to Verilog-AMS, providing analog and mixed-signal extensions in order to define the behavior of analog and mixed-signal systems
One of the biggest challenges in the creation of analog behavioral models is; whose job is it? The analog designer is the most familiar with the circuit performance and specific behaviors, however, many analog designers typically are not programmers and familiar with the languages mentioned above. The digital designer, who also tends to be the full chip verification engineer, is most familiar with programming languages, but lacks the analog specific circuit knowledge. Therefore, a blend of both skill sets is required or a conscience effort for both designers to work together. One must continually make the tradeoff of effort versus benefit when deciding to create an analog behavioral model. Some of the questions that come to mind are: Can I re-use it? How long will it take me to create a high quality model? What performance gains can I expect?
Finally, as you consider adding analog behavioral modeling to your design repertoire; consider your modeling goals and language. A performance model needs to capture specific circuit behavior and can affect your effort versus benefit equation, while a functional model requires you to only capture the 1st order effects that are needed to verify the circuit functionality. Model On!
And what about SystemC-AMS ?
I agree analog designers are not so at ease with programming, but SystemC-AMS is to be mentionned in the list.
I feel both functional ( basic ) and performance modeling is critical at different phases of a project. In the beginning phase when both analog and digital designs are still under construction, a basic functional model can catch a lot of simple issues like connectivity, bit-swapping and polarity issues which can then be immediately rectified. Once design is a bit stable, model can be improved towards performance side so that other complicated issues can then be caught with faster simulations.
As u rightly put, digital designers have littel knowledge and analog designers are not familiar with modelling nor do they have time in most cases. Also, there is a lot of communication gap between analog and digital designers mostly due to totally different skill set needed for both. Its best to have a dedicated AMS verification engineer who knows both digital and analog basics and is also good in modelling. It can relly help bridge the gap and help catch a lot of issues much earlier in the design phase speeding up the tape out process dramatically.