<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.cadence.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>DIY Cloud vs. Managed Cloud for EDA: The Hidden Tax Engineers Are Paying</title><link>/cadence_blogs_8/b/cloud/posts/diy-cloud-vs-managed-cloud-for-eda-the-hidden-tax-engineers-are-paying</link><description>For many semiconductor teams, cloud adoption started with the best of intentions: Lift some EDA workloads to the cloud. Add elasticity. Reduce capital spend. Move faster.
And for a while, it worked.
But today, a growing number of design teams are dis</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator></channel></rss>