Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
Verification Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
The Cadence Academic Network helps build strong relationships between academia and industry, and promotes the proliferation of leading-edge technologies and methodologies at universities renowned for their engineering and design excellence.
Participate in CDNLive
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia to network with industry. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to the industry attendees at the Academic Track at CDNLive EMEA and Silicon Valley.
Come & Meet Us @ Events
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to industry attendees.
Americas University Software Program
Join the 250+ qualified Americas member universities who have already incorporated Cadence EDA software into their classrooms and academic research projects.
EMEA University Software Program
In EMEA, Cadence works with EUROPRACTICE to ensure cost-effective availability of our extensive electronic design automation (EDA) tools for non-commercial activities.
Apply Now For Jobs
If you are a recent college graduate or a student looking for internship. Visit our exclusive job search page for interns and recent college graduate jobs.
Cadence is a Great Place to do great work
Learn more about our internship program and visit our careers page to do meaningful work and make a great impact.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
Overview All Courses Asia Pacific EMEANorth America
Instructor-led training [ILT] are live classes that are offered in our state-of-the-art classrooms at our worldwide training centers, at your site, or as a Virtual classroom.
Online Training is delivered over the web to let you proceed at your own pace, anytime and anywhere.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
Part 2 - I/O TIMING: Talking Outside The BoxIt wouldn't be a chip or block if it didn't have to talk to something other than itself right? We could always assume that every input arrives at exactly the same time, and every output has exactly the same amount of external delay. The downside is you may never realize some of the more complex aspects of the I/O timing without digging a little further. Last time we talked about the right questions to ask with respect to the clocks, now let's go over some items to check in the constraints dealing with I/O and port communication.
"That's great you closed timing on the interface. Too bad it was with the wrong clock."
"Wait, you mean data flows in both directions? Why didn't someone tell me that!"
"The customer told me that the data could arrive at the beginning of the clock all the way to the end of the clock. That should be easy to meet..."
"The only thing with my block is, it must be in a loving environment. Only sharp input slews and low output capacitance will do with this cream puff."Going back to the check_timing report, it should list any I/O ports that have no constraint input/output delay associated with it. While you may have a set_false_path -from/-to on the port, it will still remind you to double check that.Some of the checks it will do:
Another thing to think about, if the constraints have been partitioned from the top-level in Encounter, the I/O constraints should have good realistic values for the items above. Of course you better hope the constraints at the top-level were defined correctly...
Next time in part 3, we'll tackle the questions to ask for Exception Path Timing!
Hi dferrao! Thanks for the comment. I've battled for good I/O constraints from RTL developers as well, and unfortunately I find that every design is different and one rule does not necessarily apply to all. If we are talking about a block, I generally assign input and output delay values that are 10% for early and 90% for late. So for example, if I have a clock period of 2.0ns, I'll have:
set_input_delay 0.200 -clock [get_clocks clk1] -min [get_ports portA] -add_delay
set_input_delay 1.800 -clock [get_clocks clk1] -max [get_ports portA] -add_delay
That' is certainly aggressive, but I'm doing this in light of the fact I have no idea what these values are and it can help me identify I/O problems early on. If however this is effecting my reg2reg optimization, I'll back it off to 20% and 80%.
For chip I/O timing, that's a whole other creature. Everything depends on how the data is being referenced, and the interface that you are timing. I have personally worked on a chip where I did not have chip I/O constraints until 2 weeks prior to tapeout. It's not fun, but the only way I received those was continuously bugging the constraint designer! You can try your best at having something in place to atleast become more familiar with any problems later on. Just do your best at having some understanding of the interface and leaning on the pessimistic side for the constraints until you get realistic values.
I really got troubles on that in past designs.
I did close time for some hold/setup environment and then find it was just a draft.
When doing first trial synthesis the I/O constraints should be mature or leave some margin, other way you can find too late that you RTL will not work with the final I/O constraints.
Any suggestion on how to get your initial I/O constraints usefull? I mean, they will change for sure, but I don't want it to make time closure a pain or impossible.