Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
Some describe it as a tension. Others described
it as a cultural gap or a cultural unfamiliarity. Some suggested, somewhat
tongue-in-cheek, completely new naming conventions.
But any you slice it, there seems to be agreement
that the level of electronic system design complexity that the industry
grapples with today requires a new approach to engineering and perhaps a new
type of engineer.
software teams have to move to do more from an RTL perspective, but the
validation guys need to have the platform healthy enough so that when it gets
there, at least some validation has been done."
Cadence's Frank Schirrmeister, group director for
product marketing of the System Development Suite, pushed the discussion
further, raising the question whether we need a "new species" of
I see a meeting at which both the software and the hardware guys attend, the
first thing they do is introduce themselves to each other with business cards.
Both of them are so busy, and both are facing increasing complexity. Do we need
a new type of engineer—a new person who is deep enough to do both?"
Sandeep Pendharkar, vice president and head of
product engineering at Vayavya Labs, by way of anecdote, cited one manager who
has hired three software engineers to be part of the design verification team.
Those software engineers wrote device driver code in C, while verification
engineers sat next to them to understand it and then apply it to their jobs.
"It's difficult to get people to understand this,
but it might be like having software guys be part of the verification team,"
Knowlson said that while a new "species" of
engineer probably is not required, a new type of system engineer is emerging,
which he called "really more like glue engineers."
glue is to know enough about the specific firmware that you can take it and
modify it, and then work with the design guys. Getting to the software guys
early enough is really tough. You can get the architects. But getting people
who know the code early enough is always a challenge."
Schirrmeister responded that the "glue"
engineer is becoming more like a moderator or, in his words, "let's call
him Dr. Phil." "He knows enough about both sides to be
dangerous and to challenge a bluff from software or hardware guys that it's not
their problem," Schirrmeister added.
So, let's put the question to you: Moderator? Dr.
Phil? Glue engineer? New species? What do you think we need to manage the relentless increase in system design complexity?
—DVCon 2014 Video: What's the Missing Piece in Verification?
—DVCon 2014 Panel: Did We Create the
Functional Verification Gap?
—Jim Hogan at DVCon 2014: Functional
Verification Faces "Abundant Chaos" from New Technologies
—Lip-Bu Tan at DVCon 2014: EDA/Silicon
Ecosystem Crucial to Innovation