Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
The Cadence Academic Network helps build strong relationships between academia and industry, and promotes the proliferation of leading-edge technologies and methodologies at universities renowned for their engineering and design excellence.
Participate in CDNLive
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia to network with industry. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to the industry attendees at the Academic Track at CDNLive EMEA and Silicon Valley.
Come & Meet Us @ Events
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to industry attendees.
Americas University Software Program
Join the 250+ qualified Americas member universities who have already incorporated Cadence EDA software into their classrooms and academic research projects.
EMEA University Software Program
In EMEA, Cadence works with EUROPRACTICE to ensure cost-effective availability of our extensive electronic design automation (EDA) tools for non-commercial activities.
Apply Now For Jobs
If you are a recent college graduate or a student looking for internship. Visit our exclusive job search page for interns and recent college graduate jobs.
Cadence is a Great Place to do great work
Learn more about our internship program and visit our careers page to do meaningful work and make a great impact.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
Overview All Courses Asia Pacific EMEANorth America
Instructor-led training [ILT] are live classes that are offered in our state-of-the-art classrooms at our worldwide training centers, at your site, or as a Virtual classroom.
Online Training is delivered over the web to let you proceed at your own pace, anytime and anywhere.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
I always get this wry smile on my face when I see it happen. An effort that is launched with lofty ideals and worthy goals, but with those predictable pitfalls that will, in the end, park the car on the train tracks, just waiting for the next locomotive (driven by someone of impure motives) to blast the dreams right off the tracks. With act one firmly in the books at this point (the car is positioned), it will take significant efforts to ensure that onrushing train does not reach its target prior to pushing things back onto the road. Another one of those predictable melodramas? Maybe, maybe not. The outcome in this case is not so certain. It will take a concerted effort to prevent the disaster though.
All metaphors aside, the ratification of IEEE 1801, formerly Accellera Unified Power Format, has been ratified. Some great work was done to evolve the format into a production-worthy set of semantics, such as moving from a net-based to a domain-based semantic. Like Si2’s Common Power Format, which has a couple of years as a standard in full flow production usage at this point, 1801 set out with the original goal of unifying the description of the power strategy for SoC’s into a single, golden file that could be used throughout the design, verification and implementation processes.
However, around final balloting time, when the troops were perhaps a little battle weary, a curious turn of events transpired. One of the original tenets of the work, the goal of a single golden, unified description of the power strategy for a chip, was set aside in the name of “progress” towards ratification. Provisions in the standard were made to “de-unify” the power strategy specification. The original stated objective was to unify the description of voltage domains, isolation logic, level shifters, which registers should retain state, the different power states of the chip and the transitions between them. With a single improbable maneuver in the last throws of ratification the entire concept of “unified” has been lost.
The divergence from the simplicity of an aggregated power strategy description in a single, golden file, to the hide and seek anarchy of spreading the strategy across functional (HDL), constraint (SDC), library (LIB), and power files (UPF) could ultimately be a death blow to interoperability. More importantly, it fundamentally adds an unnecessary element of complexity that will undoubtedly lead to delays in project schedules and chip failures.
Essentially what has transpired is that the standard serves as a public communication of proprietary methods. While you could argue that this is an improvement over the past, it is so far from the original ideal that you really ought to be scratching you head at this point. Why? Why would they do this? One committee member, an IP provider, confided to me, with a shrug of the shoulders as if to say “that’s life”, that they would never use the format in that disaggregated manner; therefore it was not a problem to them. However it is a huge threat to the purpose of a standard – interoperability.
The perpetrators of this crime against design came adorned with excuses. One somewhat “priceless” claim was that it was being done in the name of saving the users of commercial IP users from themselves. What was really going on had a lot more to do with control than solving engineering problems. The owners of the “de facto” standards seek to broaden their silent stranglehold on design data to continue to leverage it in the hopes of holding users hostage via format rather than capability.
It ought to be with religious-like zealousness that the design community responds with outrage. From the outset it was chip designers, library vendors, foundries, service companies all agreeing that an aggregated power strategy specification was the best approach. Interoperability is not being served. The larger challenge of advanced low power design is not being served. It seems that, at this point, only a selfish agenda is being served.
They were so close to getting it right. What can be done at this point? It will take a concerted collaborative effort to ensure that the “working subset” of IEEE 1801 is the unified elements of the standard. A de-facto standard within the standard will be needed to ensure that the promise of interoperability and the challenges of low power design can be maximally addressed. If not, it may be well that case that the locomotive reaches its target and we all look back, holding our thumb and forefinger an inch apart and say, “well, they were that close to getting it right”.