Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our Verification Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
Verification Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
More Support Log In
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
The Cadence Academic Network helps build strong relationships between academia and industry, and promotes the proliferation of leading-edge technologies and methodologies at universities renowned for their engineering and design excellence.
Participate in CDNLive
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia to network with industry. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to the industry attendees at the Academic Track at CDNLive EMEA and Silicon Valley.
Come & Meet Us @ Events
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to industry attendees.
Americas University Software Program
Join the 250+ qualified Americas member universities who have already incorporated Cadence EDA software into their classrooms and academic research projects.
EMEA University Software Program
In EMEA, Cadence works with EUROPRACTICE to ensure cost-effective availability of our extensive electronic design automation (EDA) tools for non-commercial activities.
Apply Now For Jobs
If you are a recent college graduate or a student looking for internship. Visit our exclusive job search page for interns and recent college graduate jobs.
Cadence is a Great Place to do great work
Learn more about our internship program and visit our careers page to do meaningful work and make a great impact.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
Overview All Courses Asia Pacific EMEANorth America
Instructor-led training [ILT] are live classes that are offered in our state-of-the-art classrooms at our worldwide training centers, at your site, or as a Virtual classroom.
Online Training is delivered over the web to let you proceed at your own pace, anytime and anywhere.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technology. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
By Diego Hammerschlag
Sr. Technical Leader
The “Orbiter” was a spacecraft on a mission to study the planet Mars. Unfortunately, Lockheed Martin and NASA had a mix up using Imperial units (pounds, miles, etc.) and Metric units (kilometers, kilograms, etc.) Bad things happen to spacecraft when such mix ups occur. The Orbiter was no exception to this and after entering orbit at 57 km, instead of the 140 km it was supposed to, it quickly disintegrated due to the material stress induced. This “simple” mistake only cost US$ 327.6 Million, not to mention, countless hour of work on all the researchers whose work was on the spacecraft.
You may wonder, what does this have to do with your latest advanced node project? As technologies keep shrinking, libraries have been slowly but surely migrating to different units. Years ago it was the norm to use nanoseconds and picofarads for units of timing and capacitance respectively but this is no longer the case. In the case of timing, some collateral uses nanoseconds whereas other uses picoseconds and old legacy collateral may still be using microseconds. Thus far I have only mentioned timing and capacitance units, but this trend is true for all units used in the flow. The good news is that these issues should not affect the way EDA tools interpret the various libraries that are used since the units they require are specified in the files themselves. The bad news is that flows require other files that do not specify the units to be used and those files put your design at risk.
The most common example of a file without unit specification but implicitly using them is the SDC file that mainly contains the design’s timing intent. A command in an SDC file may be specified as
> set_load 3.5 ...
> set_input_delay –clock clk 4.5 [get_ports ...]
Note that neither of the examples shown specifies the unit. The unit is inferred from some rule based on the unit definitions of the library collateral or other mechanisms. The fact is that different EDA tools follow different unit inference rules. This is not only true across different vendors but, even within the same vendor, there are no consistent rules to resolve unit-conflicts across libraries. Synthesis tools frequently rely on the units used in the first library read. This means that, depending on the ordering of your libraries, the units will be interpreted differently. This is neither intuitive nor safe and need to be handled carefully.
To make matters worse, the advent of additional languages to specify additional information further exacerbates the problem. Take, for example, the Si2 Common Power Format (CPF). CPF is used to capture power intent and has its own commands set_power_unit and set_timing_unit for setting power and timing units respectively. As a result, the question comes up of whether or not the commands mentioned take precedence over the library collateral and / or native commands? Is the scope of such commands only in the CPF file? What should be the default if the commands are not used in the CPF file?
Finally, as if there were not enough unit challenges already, there is a question of what units should be used when generating output files. Should it be the same as the units used on the input files? Should a given tool always generate output files using the same units? Should it only be controlled by native commands?
Hopefully this article has helped illustrate the challenges ahead of us due to the shift in the units we use to do our job. In part II of this article, I will discuss in more detail specific cases of how tools defer in determining their default units and several ways in which such differences could be addressed.
Don’t let your project become another “Mars Orbiter”!!!
For more information on the Mars Obrbiter refer to: