Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our Verification Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
Verification Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
More Support Log In
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
The Cadence Academic Network helps build strong relationships between academia and industry, and promotes the proliferation of leading-edge technologies and methodologies at universities renowned for their engineering and design excellence.
Participate in CDNLive
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia to network with industry. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to the industry attendees at the Academic Track at CDNLive EMEA and Silicon Valley.
Come & Meet Us @ Events
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to industry attendees.
Americas University Software Program
Join the 250+ qualified Americas member universities who have already incorporated Cadence EDA software into their classrooms and academic research projects.
EMEA University Software Program
In EMEA, Cadence works with EUROPRACTICE to ensure cost-effective availability of our extensive electronic design automation (EDA) tools for non-commercial activities.
Apply Now For Jobs
If you are a recent college graduate or a student looking for internship. Visit our exclusive job search page for interns and recent college graduate jobs.
Cadence is a Great Place to do great work
Learn more about our internship program and visit our careers page to do meaningful work and make a great impact.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
Overview All Courses Asia Pacific EMEANorth America
Instructor-led training [ILT] are live classes that are offered in our state-of-the-art classrooms at our worldwide training centers, at your site, or as a Virtual classroom.
Online Training is delivered over the web to let you proceed at your own pace, anytime and anywhere.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technology. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
In the distributed co-design environment in the SPB16.5 Allegro Package Designer release, a die abstract file is used to convey die information between IC and package layout tools. For ECO purposes, it is imperative to know the changes that are incorporated inside an abstract file before incorporating them in the database. The Component Compare feature in SiP allows you to view differences between die layout information contained in a die abstract file and the database component. It does not report I/0 cell, port or library information. Alternately, SoC Encounter has an optional checking ability in its readDieAbstract command to report layout differences with the IC database. These comparators are tool-specific.
This new feature is for a standalone comparator tool to compare die information from two die abstract files. By being standalone, it can be used by both SiP and SoC Encounter without being tied to a specific database. The tool also makes a full-blown comparison of information inside the abstract files, including I/O cells, ports, arrays etc, and the comparisons are not only limited to die pins, as with the Comp Compare feature.
During IC and Package co-design, changes are being made by both IC and package designers. As part of an ECO-validation process, this tool can be used to see the kind of changes in the abstract file before importing them in a package or IC design.
For example, in SiP, this can be done by comparing the abstract file and the one stored in, and representing, the package database. The File> Export> Die Abstract File command can be used to output the current die abstract file from a SiP Layout database for comparison with a new die abstract.
Alternatively, at the end of the co-design process, it is imperative that both IC and package designers are seeing identical pin data. The package and IC designer can run this tool to verify that the die pin pattern in the IC and package designs match.
Read on for more details …
Menu and Command-Line Access
This feature is only available by running it in the DOS or Unix/Linux shell.
The syntax is:“diacompare file1 file2 [output] [-nolibrary] [-noport] [-norow] [-noobstacle] [-nobump] [-noarray] [-noinstance] [-nonet] [-noproperty]”- diacompare – path and name of executable to run the dia compare tool.- file1 – path and name of first abstract file. This is considered the file containing the golden data by default (i.e. the report will highlight differences based on this master file).- file2 – path and name of second abstract file to compare against the master file. This is optional and if not specified, input will be taken from the standard input stream.- output – path and name of text output file. This is optional, and if not specified, output will be written to standard output stream.The following flags are for checks to be excluded for comparison:-nolibrary – cell library information.-noport – port information.-norow – row information.-noobstacle – obstacle information.-nobump – bump information.-noarray – array information.-noinstance – instance information.-nonet – net information.-noproperty – property information. Example: “diacompare abstract1.dia abstract2.dia report.txt –noport” would compare all the above checks except for port information, from the abstract files abstract1.dia and abstract2.dia in the current directory and generate the results in file report.txt in the current directory. This tool does not have a graphical user interface at this time but is planned for the 16.6 release. Log File
This feature will generate an ASCII report highlighting the differences. This report will be saved in a directory path and file name specified on the command line. A sample of the output file is shown below. Sample output file:
DIA Compare Report v1.0 created on: Jul 08 14:04:02 2010--------------------------------------------------------------------------Original abstract filename: d:\work\latestdia\compare.dia created in cdnsipECO abstract filename: d:\work\latestdia\master.dia created in cdnsip # [Added] - Found in ECO and missing from original file.# [Deleted] - Found in original and missing from ECO file.# [Modified] - Found in original and ECO, but with listed differences.# N/A - Value not found in file.10 differences were found:-------------------------------================================Header ( 2 difference(s) found )================================[Modified]Die Box : (0,0) x (4594635,4593525) vs. (0,0) x (4594645,4593525)[end Modified] [Modified]Manufacturing Grid : 0.005000 vs. 0.004000[end Modified]================================Port ( 4 difference(s) found )================================[Deleted] AHB_HADDR[end Deleted][Modified] [Port AHB_HADDR]Port Direction : [Input] vs. Port Net Name : AHB_HADDR vs. AHB_HADDR[end Modified][Added] AHB_HADDR [Dir: Input, Net Name: AHB_HADDR][end Added]================================Row ( 1 difference(s) found )================================[Modified] [Row CORNER_SE]Row Site Name : CornerSite vs. CornerSite1[end Modified]================================Bump ( 2 difference(s) found )================================[Modified] [Bump Bump_316_2_3]Bump Cell Name : BUMP8 vs. BUMP81[end Modified][Modified] [Bump Bump_314_0_3]Bump Lower Left : (1025000,2225000) vs. (1025001,2225000)[end Modified]================================Instance ( 1 difference(s) found )================================[Modified] [Instance talon_core/tdmac_1/tri_des_rx/OUTfifo/dpram/ram0]Master Cell Name : RAM2P_1024x32 vs. RAM32P_1024x32[end Modified]
Watch a Video on this feature!
As usual, please share your experience with this new 16.5 feature.
Jerry "GenPart" Grzenia