<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://community.cadence.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why Testing Automated Driving Is Harder Than It Looks</title><link>/cadence_blogs_8/b/pss/posts/why-testing-automated-driving-is-harder-than-it-looks</link><description>Most people assume the hardest part of automated driving is building the technology itself. After all, enabling a vehicle to recognize traffic signs, detect pedestrians, stay within its lane, and react to complex traffic situations sounds like an ex.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator></channel></rss>