Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
I am often asked for guidelines on maximizing speed vs. accuracy for SpectreRF harmonic balance simulations. In a series of 3 blogs, I'll discuss some of the "knobs" that you can tweak, those being: * Which Engine: Spectre or APS? * Oversample vs Number of Harmonics * Harmonic Trimming Today, I'll discuss Knob 1. Choosing the appropriate engine....Spectre or APS? The choice between Spectre vs APS boils down to the size of the circuit you are simulating (and the number of licenses you're willing to spend on the simulation.) APS takes more MMSIM tokens. See Article 20044367 .Even for small circuits, APS will be faster than Spectre. This is because the CMOS models get more efficient and the solver gets more efficient when using APS, even if multithreading isn't turned on due to small circuit size. For medium to large circuits (100+ devices), APS should be considerably faster. It is recommended that you start with 2 threads. (If you use 8 or 16 threads, the simulation may actually be slower than with 2 threads because the overhead cost of parallelization for the additional threads overshadows the speed advantage of additional threads for such small circuits.) So, how can you determine how many threads to use? (i.e. determine the optimum number of threads to use for a particular circuit).
Note that the "auto" setting has some limitations. It checks for the number of CPUs on the machine and automatically spawns that number of jobs (so if it finds 8 CPUs, it spawns 8 CPU threads). It does not look at circuit size. It doesn't look at CPU utilization on the machine. When using multithreading, you need to be careful. The software assumes that other jobs are not running on the various cores available. If there are other jobs running, they will slow those cores down...which in turn slows down all core jobs. In general, it is recommended to use 1 thread per core.You can specify which cores to use with the '-processor' keyword. See Solution 11584226 for more information. (http://support.cadence.com/wps/mypoc/cos?uri=deeplinkmin:ViewSolution;solutionNumber=11584226)Another thing to consider when using APS is the preserve_inst option. For information on how preserve_inst affects speed vs accuracy in APS, see Solution 11642414: How does the spectre option preserve_inst affect simulation? (http://support.cadence.com/wps/mypoc/cos?uri=deeplinkmin:ViewSolution;solutionNumber=11642414)
For more tips like this, please visit Cadence Online Support . Please note that you must be a Cadence Customer on Maintenance to access this website .
Stay tuned....next time I'll talk about Knob 2.... Oversample vs Number of Harmonics!
Have fun simulating!