Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
In recent posting published by John Cooley on Deepchip.com, users compared FPGA-based prototyping systems to Palladium systems. I always like to read responses that reflect user views -- as we all know these are always more credible.
I would like to summarize the inputs to this posting here:
Key Palladium benefits mentioned:
1. Fast Tunaround/Build time (after you find a bug) takes minutes in Palladium vs. hours/days for FPGA-based prototyping. The faster times increase productivity. No dedicated engineer needed for Palladium compilation - "everybody can do it."
2. Visibility into all registers, nets and memories with large trace depths saves debug and emulation time. Finding more bugs (3-4X) with fewer people (1/2).
3. Configurable -- can maintain multiple versions of the design in a simple way in Palladium
4. Multi-user capability helps testing in parallel multiple sub-systems
5. TCL scripting automates compilation process
6. SpeedBridge adapters automatically adjust the external live interfaces for emulation speed
7. Can be used for SW development and boot-up OS earlier (when RTL is generated, even is it is unstable)
8. Scalable capacity
9. Predictable performance
10 . Lower cost of ownership (resources for support) and higher reliability
Key FPGA-Based prototyping benefits:
1. Higher performance/speed reduces run-time, especially when the design is more stable and SW development is the primary use model.
2. Cost of materials - if you need multiple platforms as replicants
3. Can run at real-time in some situations
In general, the conclusion of most of the users is that these two solutions are complimentary to each other and being used in different phases of the design development process. It would be nice if there was more automation from one system to another.
If you have more comments and did not provide a submission to John, I will be interested to hear from you here.