Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
The "Electrical constraint set>static phase tolerance" in the constraint manager is what controls this. Click on the button that says"ns" and select "mils". Then type in the tolerance you would like. I usually type in 10 mils. Remember that "10 mils" will give you +/- 10 mils window. So any given diff pair may have 20 mil difference between the two trace lengths. The smaller the tolerance you give the harder it is to hit that "window" when you are sliding the traces around. You can also use delay tune in the single trace mode to "stretch out" the shorter trace so it is a closer match to the longer trace.
Hope this helps
In reply to padmaster:
I hope you are telling about Allegro16.5 or 16.6,is it possible in 16.3 or lower versions?
In reply to PRASH36:
I'm using 16.5 but I know it is the same back to 16.2. I don't have any versions older than that installed.
Thanks for your help, it is not quite the solution I was hoping for.
The trace loops back on itself, and I am trying to figure out how to have them equal lengths while keeping the same distance from each other across the whole trace. Maybe there is no automatic or eloquent solution for this.
In reply to TMCCANN:
The inside trace is always going to be slightly shorter than the outside trace. Unless of course you use delay tune to put a bump in the shorter trace. But at high speeds the bump can be worse than the trace lengths being slightly mismatched.
Yes, that's what I thought. I will just have to rearrange the components or figure it out.
What causes the requirement for both sides of a diff pair to be of equal length? I've never had a respected SI engineer show concern about a 5mm length difference under 10gHz.
Discussions of PCI-E 2.0 and 3.0 SI techniques focus on obtaining uniform dielectric properties along both nets. No mention of matching lengths on the pair.
In reply to Robert Finley: