Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Good morning all,
I have a switch on a pcb which has a button cap placed on it. I created a round keepout to avoid placing components around the switch which will hit the button cap. I draw the actuator as a second placebound top for when I view the board in 3D. Since the actuator for the switch is higher than the keepout for the button cap I get a DRC error. Is it possible to layer the keepouts so I can place a higher keepout or "keepout void" within the button cap keepout or is the only way is to change the height of the switch actuator placebound top?
You can add Min/Max Height to the second placebound so it vaults over the first placebound.
The second placebound will have a Min Height set to the Max Height of the first placebound so they never come in contact with each other in the Z-Axis and you won't get a DRC.
Hope this helpsMike Catrambone
In reply to mcatramb91:
The switch actuator goes from 185 to 390. (in mils) The first keepout is min 260, max 300, diameter 500(rim on the button). The second keepout is min 300, max 500, diameter 250(button height). I get 2 DRC errors...one constraint 260, actual 390, and the second constraint 300, actual 390. Any suggestions?
In reply to KEN13:
You could reduce the placebound height of the switch actuator so it goes from 185 to 260 instead of 185 to 390.
The only other option is to create openings in the other two placebounds for "rim of the button" and the "button height" so the switch actuator passes thru them without contacting them. Of course this becomes more difficult because you cannot have voids in placebound shapes so I normally goes with the first option to save the extra work.
Hope this helps,Mike Catrambone
Thank you both for your answers. I will problably just make a complex keepout.