Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
I am revising a board file that was originally done in June, 2006. There are a lot of shapes on them and they are classified as solid filled. Being a newbie, I'm not sure what this means. They look like they are dynamic filled but don't seem to behave the same way. Should I convert them to dynamic filled or just leave them?
Thanks in advance for your input.
Do you mean Static solid filled? The size and purpose of the shape is also important in determining the type of copper fill to use. Static shapes will reduce the size and complexity of your design file, but they will not automatically update when changes are made. Without knowing the specifics of the design, it is difficult to make a blanket recommendation on the type of shape to use. Dynamic shapes have the advantage of changing with the design, while static shapes take less space, and shape commands fru faster.Regards,
What class are the shapes? Etch? or something else?
They are not static shapes, but not dynamic either. They are etch and they update, but not the way dynamic shapes update. I think the board may have been created using V.14. (before dynamic shapes?) I was just wondering if I should change them to dynamic or if I could just leave them.Thanks!
If they gerber out fine, and DRC properly (after you make ECO changes, I'm assuming you're updating the board right?), I'd leave them alone. Funny things 'can' happen when you change shapes from Static to Dynamic (yes, the older ones are now considered Static).If all works well now... don't break the 'machine'. :)Good day.Mitch
Thanks Mitch. That's exactly the information I was looking for!Jackie
I agree with Mitch that the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" approach is usually the best approach to take. So if your Gerbers read good and you can go to fab with no errors, then there's no reason to change. If the design needed significant changes and the shapes were causing you problems, then I'd consider making them dynamic shapes.