Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Hi everyone, Is anyone doing ring-style power switch cell insertion? Most of the designs I've run into use column-style power switch cell. Any thoughts on the advantages/disadvantages of either method?Thanks.
Sometimes your choice of style is limited by the availability of the power switch type in your library.However if you have options between the two, below are some considerations.One analogy I would use is the comparison of wire bond vs. flip chip design. 1. For an already hardened block, ring configuration is much easier to implement. You can just build a ring around the block instead of opening the block again for column.2. Floorplans are much easier with ring configuration. Especially when you have large blocks, memories or macros. 3. Cell placement is easier with ring configuration. This may lead to easier timing closure.4. Less routing overhead on ring configuration. The vias attaching the power switch to the always on grid does reduce routing tracks.5. Column structure has advantage on IR Drop. Typically you can build a more robust always on power structure on the upper layer with the column structure. Then drop the power switch where it is needed. With ring you can suffer significant IR drop after the power switch having a solid power after the voltage drop does not help much.6. Also having power source in the middle will reduce IR drop by half compared to the edge. Imagine if you only have one power source for a block, putting one in the middle guarantees that any points in the block are no more than half the width away from the power source.7. EM requirement for the power rail after the power switch could be less for the column style, since the current can spread from the center to both sides Vs one side for the ring configuration.8. Arguably the column configuration will use less area.9. Column structure can do more options for power sequencing to reduce glitch on neighboring cells. Hope that helps, Tobing