Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
I've have a question about PlaceDesign. When I'm using timingdriven within a constraints. I suppose that FE should do STA before doing placement. So 've just wonder how the delay (nets, cell) are calculated, because FE don't have informations about the routing (load+capacitance) and input transitions.So my question is:- Which setUseDefaultDelayLimit has been used (default > 1000 fanout)?- Which setDefaultNetDelay has been used (default 1ns by > 1000 fanout)?- Which setDefaultNetLoad has been used (default 0.5 pF by > 1000 fanout)?- What does FE with pre-specified clocktree before placement?- And which critical paths should FE try to optimize first (the worst paths)?. (FE could start to optimize on the worst paths which should be from a reset signal with a very large number of fanout but the timing is not a issue)Regards,
Hi DN,I have some idea on how it is done; but it is base on my understanding of the methodology, and so might be incorrect. Here it goes:- Pre-specified clock tree is for the tool to recognise the clock gating cell. Placement of the clock gating cell is as important as the placement of the FF. This will result in a better clock tree- At the end of the day, global placement is mainly congestion driven + optimise the wire length. Timing coming in as timing driven, but I think it is mostly an iterative improvement at the later stage of global placement.- Cadence has a new approach call "virtual buffer tree" which you can see in the log file at the beginning of placeDesign. It will buffer the HFO, and thus signal like reset tree is not so bad as it is seen after placeDesign.Personally, I prefer placeDesign to perform some type of sizing and buffering. By not doing so, it cannot more accurately identify critical path during global placment. As a result, it is more common to use region/fence for SOC (okay, it is my limited experience and may be very biased. Do correct me if you think otherwise).Regards,Eng Han