Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
Verification Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
The Cadence Academic Network helps build strong relationships between academia and industry, and promotes the proliferation of leading-edge technologies and methodologies at universities renowned for their engineering and design excellence.
Participate in CDNLive
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia to network with industry. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to the industry attendees at the Academic Track at CDNLive EMEA and Silicon Valley.
Come & Meet Us @ Events
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to industry attendees.
Americas University Software Program
Join the 250+ qualified Americas member universities who have already incorporated Cadence EDA software into their classrooms and academic research projects.
EMEA University Software Program
In EMEA, Cadence works with EUROPRACTICE to ensure cost-effective availability of our extensive electronic design automation (EDA) tools for non-commercial activities.
Apply Now For Jobs
If you are a recent college graduate or a student looking for internship. Visit our exclusive job search page for interns and recent college graduate jobs.
Cadence is a Great Place to do great work
Learn more about our internship program and visit our careers page to do meaningful work and make a great impact.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
Overview All Courses Asia Pacific EMEANorth America
Instructor-led training [ILT] are live classes that are offered in our state-of-the-art classrooms at our worldwide training centers, at your site, or as a Virtual classroom.
Online Training is delivered over the web to let you proceed at your own pace, anytime and anywhere.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Hi all,When do data-oriented functional coverage, can we put the covergroup in transaction class directly? And is there any short guideline how to do?For example,I have transaction define class like://-----------class video_pkg_c; rand bit [7:0] opcode_1; rand bit [7:0] opcode_2; rand bit [15:0] data; //---- // can I add covergroup here? //----endclassclass video_pkg_driver; ... ... video_pkg_c video_pkg; video_pkg = new(); rand_result = video_pkg.randomize(); ... ...endclass//-----------I use IUS583.Best regards,Davy
Hi all,When do data-oriented functional coverage, can we put the covergroup in transaction class directly? And is there any short guideline how to do?================== I would highly recommend to avoid this. This is because, coverage ismore or less a "static" view of your verification progress and nottruly as dynamic as the transactions themselves are. I usually createa separate coverage element and hook it up. Agreed there is somerepetition in work - especially for long transaction descriptors, butone can automate it, write some script or use SV struct etc. to easethe pain.VMM also recommends some thing similar, it prefers to associatecoverage with the transactors. Another rule/guideline is "cover asclose to DUT as possible".This is b'cos, even though a packet got generated at a high levelgenerator, perhaps due to the fact that particular port was inblocking mode (a random configuration setting), the packets never wentinto the DUT. This may or may not be the desired thing. By having thetransactor tell us "when to sample" we are sure that we are coveringat the correct place. Imagine creating 10K transactions, you don'tneed 10K coverage objects as well - you simply need a "count" of whatkind of packets (Type, length, CRC etc.) went in and how many of them.This is what I refer to as "pseudo-static" item in the verificationenvironment.The hook up of coverage class to the transactor is an interestingtopic. In VMM one can use callbacks or vmm_channel::tee(). In AVM onecan use analysis ports to do this. Not sure of in uRM, some thingsimilar exists there? If we had AOP, then that would help here aswell.HTHAjeetha, CVCwww.noveldv.com
Hi,Covergroups in transactions are usually not recommended. Classes in SV are often copied (cloned) when propagated through your testbench, e.g. when sending to the DUT and the scoreboard at the same time. This may result in counting each sampling event multiple times.The correct way is sampling the coverage using a monitor which is a singleton object. It will detect the sampling event from the signals and collect the coverage only on "real" transactions that actually made it to the DUT.Gabi