Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
I need to simulate an entire receiver front end with BPF and VCO. I am not sure how to perform PSS and PAC and other harmonic
balance analyses without the LO port for the mixer. As you may remember while running
PSS we generally find the steady state response by specifying the LO
port to be the Large signal but such a port does not exist as I am
using a VCO. Can you please respond with simulation setups or point me to a dcoument that would contain the same?
If the only large signal is the VCO (i.e. you have no other large signal driven inputs), then you would simulate the mixer just as you would if you were simulating an oscillator - i.e. tell PSS that it's an oscillator and point at the output of the oscillator. Then you can have a small-signal input to the mixer, and look at the transfer function to the output of the mixer.
If you want to have a large signal (driven) signal to the mixer, to investigate (say) distortion of the input signal through the mixer, in the presence of the VCO, then you can also do this with the "hb" analysis (you need to use "hb" rather than "pss" in "harmonic balance" mode). The hb analysis allows what we call semi-autonomous analysis. If you pick this, turn on the "oscillator" checkbox and select the oscillator outputs as usual. Then for tone 1, specify the estimate of the oscillator frequency, and number of harmonics, and then specify the frequency of the other driven signals. Hopefully the use model is reasonably clear...
If this doesn't make sense, please ensure you include the subversion of icfb/virtuoso you're using (Help->About... in the CIW), and the subversion of spectre you're using (this will appear in the spectre.out displayed in ADE, or by typing "spectre -W" on the UNIX command line).
In reply to Andrew Beckett:
Thank you Andrew. Your reply made a lot of sense.
I have another question about the output I get from my VCO. It is about the different results I get from different analyses. My goal is to design a VCO operating at 2.45GHz. When I do a transient and use the frequency function in the calculator I get a freq value almost equal to 2.45 GHz. On the other hand if I do a PSS (with the oscillator box checked) and calculate the harmonic frequency I get 2.47GHz. There is a discrepancy of about 20MHz which makes a lot of difference when it comes to desigining a direct conversion/ Low-IF receiver. Which result do you think is more reliable ? The one from the calculator (2.45GHz) or the one from PSS (2.47GHz).