Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
Verification Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
The Cadence Academic Network helps build strong relationships between academia and industry, and promotes the proliferation of leading-edge technologies and methodologies at universities renowned for their engineering and design excellence.
Participate in CDNLive
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia to network with industry. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to the industry attendees at the Academic Track at CDNLive EMEA and Silicon Valley.
Come & Meet Us @ Events
A huge knowledge exchange platform for academia. We are looking for academic speakers to talk about their research to industry attendees.
Americas University Software Program
Join the 250+ qualified Americas member universities who have already incorporated Cadence EDA software into their classrooms and academic research projects.
EMEA University Software Program
In EMEA, Cadence works with EUROPRACTICE to ensure cost-effective availability of our extensive electronic design automation (EDA) tools for non-commercial activities.
Apply Now For Jobs
If you are a recent college graduate or a student looking for internship. Visit our exclusive job search page for interns and recent college graduate jobs.
Cadence is a Great Place to do great work
Learn more about our internship program and visit our careers page to do meaningful work and make a great impact.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
Overview All Courses Asia Pacific EMEANorth America
Instructor-led training [ILT] are live classes that are offered in our state-of-the-art classrooms at our worldwide training centers, at your site, or as a Virtual classroom.
Online Training is delivered over the web to let you proceed at your own pace, anytime and anywhere.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
I've simulated the noise factor of Mixer ne600p in rfExamples library with PSS+Pnoise. With the Noise Summary printed, I calculated the Noise Factor, which is (total noise at output - load noise at output)/(source noise at output), then Noise Figure can be abtained with 10*lg(Noise Factor). However, my result is very different from the Noise Figure of Pnoise.
Device Param Noise Contribution % Of Total
/rif rn 5.70677e-19 23.13 IF_OUTPUT_Port/q57 rb 2.86098e-19 11.60 /rf rn 2.74587e-19 11.13 RF_INPUT_Port/q56 rb 2.71557e-19 11.01 /r45 rn 1.60586e-19 6.51 /q57 ic 1.54208e-19 6.25 /q56 ic 1.1156e-19 4.52 /rl1 rn 1.03425e-19 4.19 /r44 rn 8.357e-20 3.39 /r46 rn 7.25826e-20 2.94 /q56 ib 5.65173e-20 2.29 /q58b rb 5.51435e-20 2.23 /q58a rb 5.51435e-20 2.23 /lo rn 4.66997e-20 1.89 /q58a ic 4.14535e-20 1.68 /q58b ic 4.14535e-20 1.68 /q58b ib 1.98622e-20 0.81 /q58a ib 1.98622e-20 0.81 /q56 re 1.28295e-20 0.52 /q57 re 1.27064e-20 0.51 /q57 ib 7.93188e-21 0.32 /q58b re 3.43834e-21 0.14 /q58a re 3.43834e-21 0.14 /q58a rc 9.14375e-22 0.04 /q58b rc 9.14375e-22 0.04 /q57 rc 9.88927e-23 0.00 /q56 fn 4.43245e-23 0.00 /q56 rc 1.67595e-23 0.00 /q58b fn 3.9707e-24 0.00 /q58a fn 3.9707e-24 0.00 /q57 fn 1.26023e-24 0.00 /rl1 fn 0 0.00 /rif ext_file_noise 0 0.00 /rf ext_file_noise 0 0.00 /r46 fn 0 0.00 /r45 fn 0 0.00 /r44 fn 0 0.00 /lo ext_file_noise 0 0.00 /lm fn 0 0.00 /lm rn 0 0.00 /ldc fn 0 0.00 /ldc rn 0 0.00 /L1 fn 0 0.00 /L1 rn 0 0.00 /L0 fn 0 0.00 /L0 rn 0 0.00
Spot Noise Summary (in V^2/Hz) at 80M Hz Sorted By Noise ContributorsTotal Summarized Noise = 2.46733e-18Total Input Referred Noise = 8.63267e-18The above noise summary info is for pnoise data
Total Noise at Output: No^2 = 2.46733e-18 V^2/Hz
Load Noise at Output: Nl^2 = 5.70677e-19 V^2/Hz
Source Noise at Output: Ns^2 = 2.74587e-19 V^2/Hz
Noise Factor: N = (No^2 - Nl^2)/(Ns^2) = 6.90729
However, according to the Noise Factor curve of Pnoise, noise factor @
80MHz is 43.11, which is very larger than 6.90729.
There must be something wrong. Anyone can help me?
Thanks in advance!
See worked example of single and double sideband noise figure in a mixer. Your mistake (from a very quick glance) is that for the denominator you are using the total output noise from the input source, rather than the output noise from the input source from the passband only (i.e. the reference sideband). Otherwise the resulting noise figure is not the ratio of the signal to noise at the input to the signal to noise at the output.
Anyway, it's covered in more detail in my solution linked to above.
In reply to Andrew Beckett:
It's a great help.
Thank you Andrew.