Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Is there any way to update Pcell parameters without forcing to execute CDF Callbacks. The CDF Callbacks are taking more time to execute when i am forcing them to execute in a script. and for every parameter we are changing there is an associated callback withit. So we have to execute all the callbacks must ?
I am using like this
Is this is the right way?
There are several things that might be going on here. First of all, depending on the PDK, you may find that calling one of the callbacks is sufficient (at the end) if the callback is common to all and ensures consistency of all the parameters. Secondly the slowness might be due to the parameter changes causing re-evaluation of the pcell, including intermediate steps as each parameter is set.
If you look at the code referenced in this recent post, you'll see that abInvokeInstCdfCallbacks takes an argument ?order, so you can tell it which callbacks to call. So for example ?order list("w" "nf") would call just those two in that order.
If you want to try to minimize the re-evaluation of the pcell, then I would do something like this:
baseCDF=cdfGetBaseCellCDF(instId~>master~>cell) cdf=abCreateEffectiveCDFLookalike(baseCDF t)
Then make your changes to cdf - so cdf~>w~>value="2u" or whatever your code needs to do to update it. For example:
cdf~>w~>value=sprintf(nil "%g" w) cdf~>wf~>value=sprintf(nil "%g" w*nfingr) cdf~>l~>value=l cdf~>fingers~>value=nfing
abInvokeObjCdfCallbacks(cdf ?order '("w")) ; or whatever order you need
And finally apply these to the instance:
I haven't checked recently (and this probably depends on the version you're using), but I think dbReplacePropList avoids multiple pcell evaluation.
Note I haven't exactly used the above before - I've used similar within a hierarchical pcell though.