Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
I have a skill code with about 5000 lines. Inside the top level procedure, everything is very simple: call two lower level functions (let's call them A and B). There is no global variables shared between function A and B except a cell view they will work on. So, I basically can run them step by step on a cell view if I like to do so.I can't explain the following facts: (1). if I run the top level procedure, which means that A and B will be run in sequence, then, it will take forever to finish the second function (B). (>24 hours). VERY SLOW!! The function A takes about 1 minute cputime to run, which is ok. (2). Run A and B step by step: run function A, which still takes about 1 minute. then, save the cell view and quite opus. restart opus and open the saved cell view. then, run function B on it, which takes about 5 minutes to finish, VERY FAST!! (3). Run A and B separately. After A finished, immediately start function B, both phenomena of item 1&2 may happen. Some times, I got B takes looong time (>24 hrs) and some times, I got B takes less than 5 minutes. If I interrupt the B function in the middle using "ctrl-C", and then, restart B, the chance is high that B will finish fast (<5 minutes).My goal is to run the top level procedure directly like in (1) in a reasonable short time.I have used profile('memory) to look into the memory usage. function A will take ~300mB and B will take ~1GB. I added needNCells to increase the initial memory allocations in my code so that the allocated numbers are large than necessary values reported by profileSummary and gcsummary. By the way, the computer I used has 6GB physical memory, much larger than the needed 1.5GB.Also, I tried to insert "gc" in several locations of the code to force it collect garbage and tried to make sure all the used variables are local so that their memory can be recycled when a function is not used anymore.But none of the above methods could help me reduce function B cputime if I run A&B together by calling the top level function. What have I missed? Please help!Thanks,Tong
Have you tried profiling the performance instead of the memory? If it is gc related, then the majority of the time will be indicated with the gc. The inconsistency in run time makes me think you have a variable that is not getting reset correctly or might be global and used by both routines. Have you run skill lint checker to look at global variables? -Derek
Does this SKILL code uses ipc and sleep calls? Is it anyway related to OSS based netlisting?
Hi, Derek and Rairaj,Thanks for your reply!To Derek: when I tried profiling cputime or looked into the gcsummary report, the time taken by gc only tens of seconds. The huge time chunk is allocated to the function B. In function B, there are a lot of list operation (creation) and dbGetOverlaps. I guess the dynamic memory allocation is causing those procedures slow when A & B are run in sequence. I did pay attention to the variable types of function A (all of them defined withing let()), and actually, the reported memory usage of function A is not huge (300mb~500mb). I should have run lint as you suggested. So, I will do "lint" for the whole script (including function A&B) and post the result back later.To Rairaj: no ipc or sleep calls in the current script. This script is for processing a layout view, basically play with shapes. Therefore, no netlist involved.Tongju