I have a question on how to short a net and a shape on different layers using the NET_SHORT property.
In my schematic I have the situation below:
PGND is the orange shape on L3 and AGND are the two nets connected to the two VIAS.
Using the NET_SHORT property on the two 2:3 VIA I was able to have them connected to the shape.
However, it still seems to be missing the connectivity between the two VIAS that should be provided by the PGND shape.
Is there any way to prevent this?
Thanks a llot
On your schematic you have three nets, VSS, AGND, PGND. Are you wanting to short VSS and AGND to the PGND Shape with vias on the board using the net_short property.
Perhaps I am reading this wrong but is that what you are trying to do ?
The final goal is to short VSS and AGND to PGND. However, in the picture both VIA are connected to AGND.
I would expect that once net_short has been set on both they should be connected while the blue line seems to indicate that connection is still missing.
Thanks for your help
Quite hard to tell exactly what is going on from just a screenshot but possible issues could be: Shapes are Dynamic and not up to date, check Shape>Global Dynamic Parameters or Design Status; the PGND shape is Static, rather than Dynamic and won't be updated to connect the Vias, change the Shape Type to Dynamic could help; you are using Negative Artwork and Dynamic Shapes and the Shapes need to be updated to reflect the connectivity change. Dynamic Shapes and positive artwork would be the recommended approach to Shapes, Shape updating of "Smooth", or "Rough", would ensure that Shape to object connectivity gets updated "as you go"
Hi oldmouldy and thanks for your reply.
PGND shape is dynamic. Indeed you can see that the vias are completely surrounded by it (because of the NET_SHORT property on the VIA)rather than having the clearence as if they were on different nets.
My question is why the two vias are not logically connected on the layout even if both have NET_SHORT set to AGND:PGND.