Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
How far have we come with low-power IC design, and where do we need to go from here? Panelists at the Cadence Ecosystem booth at the Design Automation Conference had some compelling answers for both questions Tuesday, July 28. Two panelists were from ASIC design services companies – Faraday Technology and Global Unichip. One was from ARM, and one was from Cadence.
Rather than come up with a blow-by-blow account of who said what, I have come up with two lists derived from panelist commentary – 1) what’s helping now, and 2) what’s needed in the future. Here are some of the things I’d put in either list.
What’s Helping Now
The implementation efficiency of low-power designs has greatly improved at Faraday, said Albert Chen, filed applications and marketing manager. He showed a slide that depicted an increase from around 10K gates/day in 2006 to over 80K gates/day in 2009. One reason is Faraday’s switch to the Common Power Format (CPF).
Albert Li, director of the design development division at Global Unichip, noted that most designs he sees use multiple voltage thresholds. MTCMOS power gating is coming on strong, power shutoff is becoming more widely used, and dynamic voltage and frequency scaling is beginning to appear.
Ashley Stevens, solutions architect at ARM, talked about a power management kit that ARM has developed to help minimize leakage. He discussed a research chip that used this kit along with ARM production libraries and a CPF-based tool flow. Designers were able to infer header switches and retention flops, and to manage in-rush starter current to avoid state corruption. Stevens also discussed ARM’s 40 nm and 50 nm multi-channel libraries, which can result in a 75 percent leakage savings. Area overhead ranges from 5 to 10 percent.
Alex Sgouros, SoC architect for ESL and low power at Cadence, noted that Cadence design services has used a CPF-enabled flow to “tape out hundreds of chips with a 98 percent success rate.” Noting the importance of system-level power estimation, he talked about use of the Cadence InCyte Chip Estimator and Palladium emulator for early power estimations.
Sgouros also talked about dual flops as a “no brainer” low-power design technique, available today, that can result in a 20 to 40 percent savings in the clock tree. “You can use it almost for free in terms of overhead and get significant reductions for power,” he said.
Alex Sgouros, Ashley Stevens, Albert Chen, and Albert Li (left to right) discusslow-power strategies at the Cadence Ecosystem booth.
What’s Needed in the Future
Chen noted that most of the potential power savings are at the system level. “We’ve really only addressed everything from the netlist on down,” he said. “The architectural implementation and its impacts have not yet been fully addressed. It’s really the system level we have to concentrate on.”
While measurement accuracy increases as you go down in abstraction, the ability to influence power increases as you go up in abstraction, Sgouros noted. “The architectural tradeoffs and the hardware/software tradeoffs is where you’re going to affect power the most.”
“Among low power challenges, testing is the most important. Testing is the one thing that has not been covered very well,” said Li.
Stevens mentioned several “things I’d like to see the EDA guys solve in the future.” One is the use of formal techniques to determine which critical states need to be retained, so as to minimize overhead required for retention flip-flops. Another is dynamic well biasing for variable bias generation, bias routing, and dynamic bias optimization. A third is to minimize Vdd with fault-tolerant technology, providing, as he said, “a way to reduce voltage until you start introducing errors into the design, and then recover from that process.”
Stevens also talked about silicon-on-insulator (SOI), which is today primarily used to boost performance, as an option that can reduce dynamic power by up to 30 percent at the same clock speed.
Verification of low-power designs remains a problem. One challenge, Chen said, is generating accurate test vectors to test SoCs for power consumption. He also spoke of verifying a low-power chip with over 3,000 corners and noted that a “rule based” approach is needed for such chips.
What stood out for me most was Chen’s comment that “a more holistic approach” is needed to address power concerns. “I think the systems and software guys have to start talking to the hardware designers,” he said. “It doesn’t really do much good to design a very low power chip and then have a regulator sitting right next to it that’s taking up 30 percent of your power.”