Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
I'm doing a parametric AC simulation (mmsim 11.1). I need a lot of steps, but the single simulations are fast.
When I add an S-parameter block the parametric simulations slows down because a rational fitting process is required at each simulation step ("Starting rational fitting process." message appears in the output log form).
Is it possible to save the rational model of the S-parameter block? I would like spectre could calculate the rational model only at the beginning of the sweep and then use it on the following sweep steps.
First of all, we normally don't recommend using rational (see Tawna's latest version of her nport app note) but if you really did want to, the ROM data file field on the nport component allows you to specify the file in which it is saved.
In reply to Andrew Beckett:
Hi Andrew,After my post "Enforcing causality of S parameter in file..." (Thu, Dec 1 2011 2:20 AM)==================================================================="Hello, I'm using harmonic balance analysis (mmsim 11.1) with a schematic containing anS-parameter model. In the NPORT component I set Causality Correction = no During thesimulation I get the following message: Notice from spectre during periodic steadystate analysis `hb'. Enforcing causality of S parameter in file Is it possible toavoid this time-consuming step? Thank you very much Aldo"===================================================================I opened a service request with customer support.It was suggested to me to userational fitting with a low order like 3 or 4 (I used 4).
However now, with AC, I see no problem to use SPLINE, but with HB I should continue touse RATIONAL for the issue explained in my previous post.
Do you see any drawback (I've not read yet the application note on NPORT)?
In reply to Aldo2:
Using the rational model is often even more time consuming than the causality correction...
The main problem with the rational method is that it really has not had much attention over the last few years - the focus has been on the convolution-based approaches (spline and linear). So I generally would advise against it, especially for larger number of ports or higher order systems. I have used it to check results in certain specific situations, but it would not be my first choice. Hopefully the specific issue you were having was followed up with R&D to help ensure that the s-parameter modelling is improved to handle the s-parameter data you were having problems with. Although of course we'd need to have your data to do that - not sure (I've not checked the service request).
I'm sure Tawna will chime in when she sees this.
Sr. Staff Support AE, Global Customer Support
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.