• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. expression problem from ac sweep

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 15
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 23271
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

expression problem from ac sweep

yefJ
yefJ over 6 years ago

Hello, i am trying to recreate the method described in the following post for calculating the output impedance, i put AC source as shown bellow to act as a probe , i added the coil to filter undesired signal , i put "iprobe" to get the output current , and "out" node for the output voltage.

when i tried to implement the expression for calculating the impedance , it gave me and error shown in the end.

where did i go wrong?/

Thanks


community.cadence.com/.../capacitance-vs-bias-voltage-curve-for-ferroelectric-varactor


  • Cancel
  • yefJ
    yefJ over 6 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan
    Unknown said:
    If you are trying to measure the current through your entire varactor network, the current probe can be placed in series with the gate of the drain-source connected MOS device. Remove the 100K resistor totally. The probe will then capture all the current through the drain-source connected device and the switched capacitors.

    Hello i have changed the circuit and the simulation as you said with the expression shown bellow.

    i added a 1A ac source and 1mH  inductor in series with the VVDC source.

    in the results of the formula it gives a constant capacitance no matter what VVDC voltage .

    where in the AC current source did i got wrong? 

    another problem is why we dont calculate the capacitance from the OUT node signed in red?

    the VCO will look at the capacitance from that point,so we do need to put the iprobe there and VOUT there

    am  i correct?

    Thanks

    (-1 / (2 * 1e+09 * value(imag(v("/vout" ?result "ac") / i("/IPRB0/PLUS" ?result "ac")) 1e+09) * pi))



    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 6 years ago in reply to yefJ

    Dear Yefl,

    > in the results of the formula it gives a constant capacitance no matter what VVDC voltage .

    > where in the AC current source did i got wrong?

    You did not set the DC potential at your top node vout to be anything. Hence, it is floating and will take on the same value as your applied control voltage (vvdc). Hence, there will be no change in capacitance as you change the control voltage vvdc.

    > another problem is why we dont calculate the capacitance from the OUT node signed in red?

    > the VCO will look at the capacitance from that point,so we do need to put the iprobe there and VOUT there

    > am  i correct?

    I was wondering where the VCO node was. Please use the circuit shown in the attached file to measure the capacitance as a function of your control voltage:

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • yefJ
    yefJ over 6 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Hello , i have made the test bench as you described and i got results.

    but in our VCO as shown bellow there is no ac current source,so how it's equivalent regarding the impedance that it will present in the actual system? 

    another thing is how do you suggest connecting it to the VCO?   in our varactor there is no "two sides" as in the capactior shown in the schematics bellow. 

    Thanks.


    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 6 years ago in reply to yefJ

    Dear yejf,

    > but in our VCO as shown bellow there is no ac current source,so how it's equivalent regarding

    > the impedance that it will present in the actual system?

    The impedance you are supposed to simulate is the impedance that the inductor will see. The impedance you are computing is from  node v_vco to ground. If that is the impedance the inductor will see in your VCO, that is the correct impedance to simulate.

    > in our varactor there is no "two sides" as in the capactior shown in the schematics bellow. 

    I do not understand how the varactor will vary its capacitance in your VCO circuit as there is no DC isolation of its bottom terminal from its top terminal. You can only change its capacitance with a change in DC voltage across the varactor. You need to include an AC coupling capacitor if you do not have a means to isolate the DC voltage of your varactor bottom terminal.

    I think you need to study other VCO designs in the literature as it appears your design and the capacitance voltage characteristic you plot need some design effort. Is this a school project or an actual design? This forum is focused on solving Cadence related issues.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • yefJ
    yefJ over 6 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Hello Shawn and Andrew, thank you very much , i got a good varactor exactly as you described in you test bench methodics.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
<

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information