Cadence® system design and verification solutions, integrated under our System Development Suite, provide the simulation, acceleration, emulation, and management capabilities.
System Development Suite Related Products A-Z
Cadence® digital design and signoff solutions provide a fast path to design closure and better predictability, helping you meet your power, performance, and area (PPA) targets.
Full-Flow Digital Solution Related Products A-Z
Cadence® custom, analog, and RF design solutions can help you save time by automating many routine tasks, from block-level and mixed-signal simulation to routing and library characterization.
Overview Related Products A-Z
Driving efficiency and accuracy in advanced packaging, system planning, and multi-fabric interoperability, Cadence® package implementation products deliver the automation and accuracy.
Cadence® PCB design solutions enable shorter, more predictable design cycles with greater integration of component design and system-level simulation for a constraint-driven flow.
An open IP platform for you to customize your app-driven SoC design.
Comprehensive solutions and methodologies.
Helping you meet your broader business goals.
A global customer support infrastructure with around-the-clock help.
24/7 Support - Cadence Online Support
Locate the latest software updates, service request, technical documentation, solutions and more in your personalized environment.
Cadence offers various software services for download. This page describes our offerings, including the Allegro FREE Physical Viewer.
Get the most out of your investment in Cadence technologies through a wide range of training offerings.
This course combines our Allegro PCB Editor Basic Techniques, followed by Allegro PCB Editor Intermediate Techniques.
Virtuoso Analog Design Environment Verifier 16.7
Learn learn to perform requirements-driven analog verification using the Virtuoso ADE Verifier tool.
Exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices.
The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information.
It's not all about the technlogy. Here we exchange ideas on the Cadence Academic Network and other subjects of general interest.
Cadence is a leading provider of system design tools, software, IP, and services.
Get email delivery of the Cadence blog featured here
Beginning with the 16.6 SPB release, FPGA System Planner (FSP) can create net groups automatically whenever an interface is instantiated or a protocol is created. These switches control the auto-creation of those net groups. Turning these on builds the net groups as the design is created:
Read on for more details …The default net group size is 64 signals. Protocols or interfaces with signal groups larger than 64 signals would thus have multiple net groups created. Net groups do not have to be auto-created. Other functionality exists to let you create the net groups later.For interfaces, access to the net groups is via RMB > Configure Connections…RMB on a net group cell opens a pop-up menu:
You can also rename a net group. To place signals in a new net group, select the signals then use Create and Assign New Netgroup:
Selected signals can be manually moved to a different net group. To do this, select the signals, then LMB to get the drop-down on a cell and pick the net group to which you want to move the signal. Remove a signal(s) from a net group by selecting the blank field at the top of the drop-down:
For FPGA protocols the net groups are accessed through the protocol form. The functionality is exactly the same as for interfaces:
A design can be “net grouped” after the fact even if the Settings checkboxes to auto create the net groups are turned off.
Note: Net groups do NOT have to be created in FSP. The design can be forwarded to Allegro with no net groups and the net groups can be created in Allegro and brought back into FSP:
Parts with interface-level constraints must be defined as a single net group.Groups of signals that are constrained in FSP (i.e. “same_bank” or “same_clock_region”) should also be defined as a single net group. The reasons becomes clearer when you get into Allegro and attempt to run the auto pinswap routines. The PCB designer can split the bundles as needed. But, the auto pinswap algorithm doesn’t look simply at the bundle; it looks at the constraints on the signals in the bundle. Thus, the PCB designer cannot arbitrarily create bundles from a group of signals with a “same_clock_region” constraint and expect the tools to let him flowplan those signals anywhere he wants, with no consideration to the other signals. That would violate the FPGA rules.As always – please share your experiences using this new FSP capability!Jerry “GenPart” Grzenia