• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Online CFD Course
  3. Pipe with varying cross-section

Stats

  • State Verified Answer
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 9
  • Views 2995
  • Members are here 0
More Content

Pipe with varying cross-section

Commodaro
Commodaro over 2 years ago

Hi,

Question 1

in instructions for Challenge 7, we have

Initial Solution: Vz=6 m/s

Boundary Condition - inlet: Vz=23 m/s

Should't they be equal to 23m/s ?

Question 2

Boundary Conditions - Outlet: averaged static pressure imposed.

Should we specify it as "Cartesian - Static pressure imposed" or as "Cylindrical - Static pressure imposed" (we used cylindrical for the Inlet)?

I see in the demo video that Cartesian is used.

thanks

Stefano

  • Cancel
  • Sign in to reply
Parents
  • Commodaro
    0 Commodaro over 2 years ago

    Question 1, also Vt is different, 1m/s in initial solution, 3 m/s in boundary conditions. Shall we use 3 overall?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Commodaro
    0 Commodaro over 2 years ago

    Question 1, also Vt is different, 1m/s in initial solution, 3 m/s in boundary conditions. Shall we use 3 overall?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
Children
  • Manuel NIB
    +1 Manuel NIB over 2 years ago in reply to Commodaro

    Hi Stefano,

    to question 1: Please use as initial solution the lower value with 6 m/s (and 1m/s for vt). This is on purpose. In general it is a good idea to be as close as possible to the final expected flow field. In practice the geometry is complex and we need to find a good compromise. For this particular case 23m/s would be a very suitable initial solution for the smaller pat of the pipe. In the larger part of the pipe a much lower value is more suitable. In general it is more robust for the simulation, if we choose as initial solution a value, which is rather on the lower side. For some applications it even make sense to initialize the domain with 0m/s.

    To question 2: You can choose either of these. We can do this because we specify a constant value. Here it does not matter, if we specify in the cartesian system the constant value or in the cylindrical system the constant value. But your thought is right!

    Best regards
    Manuel

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
Cadence Guidelines

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information