• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. problems on a system's phase noise evaluation

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 2080
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

problems on a system's phase noise evaluation

reddevil011
reddevil011 over 10 years ago

Hello, I have a system shown as above, and aim to evaluate the phase noise of "OUT". But I am confusing about the simulation method.

A is an oscillator; B is a just a logic buffer with another power supply.

I think of some ways to evaluate the phase noise of "OUT", using spectreRF.

CaseA: run PNoise analysis with the whole system, including A and B, select noisetype=source. Use the simulation result "output noise"  to evaluate phase noise.

CaseB: evaluate phase noise separately. run PNoise analysis with A, select noisetype=source. Use the simulation result "output noise"  to evaluate oscillator's output. Then run PNoise analysis with B, select noisetype=timedomain. Translate the simulation result "Jee" to phase noise. The two items add to "OUT"'s phase noise.

I've tried the two ways to get output phase noise. But they get different results. I am wondering which is the exact way to evaluate this system's output phase noise.

Best Regards! 

  • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 10 years ago

    Dear reddevil011,

    >CaseB: evaluate phase noise separately. run PNoise analysis with A, select noisetype=source. Use the simulation result "output noise"  to evaluate oscillator's output. Then run PNoise analysis with B, select noisetype=timedomain. Translate the simulation result "Jee" to phase noise. The two items add to "OUT"'s phase noise.

    Initially, it appears as if this will not include the impact of B loading A. This can have an impact on an oscillator's steady state amplitude and frequency. Further Jee is an integrated parameter and does not include the specific frequency components of the noise sources. AS it is a jitter parameter, it also includes only a portion of the phase noise characteristic. Hence, I am not sure how you are combining the phase noise result from A and the Jee of B to determine the phase noise result of A and B combined.

    If the added simulation time of performing a phase noise analysis of the combined A/B circuit is not excessive, I would recommend running the phase noise simulation on a netlist containing both A and B.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • reddevil011
    reddevil011 over 10 years ago

    Thank you for your advice, Shawn.  

    Firstly, when simulate block A,  the equivalent load of B is considered. So the oscillator's  steady state amplitude and frequency will not change.

    Secondly, I wanna make a correction, select noisetype=jitter when running the PNoise analysis of B, the simulation result "Jee" is in a unit of "second/sqrt(Hz)"  and translate to phase noise by multiplying (2*pi*f1), which f1 is the output frequency.

    CaseB is based the following consideration: Considering ideal Noiseless B, it is just a buffer, the system's output phase noise is equal to A's phase noise. When B's noise is considered, the total output phase noise is A's phase noise plus B's phase noise.   A is an autonomous circuit, so I select noisetype=source to run PNoise analysis; B is a driven block, so I select noisetype=jitter to run PNoise analysis.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 10 years ago

    Simulate both blocks together. In the ADE pnoise form, select "Noise Type: jitter" and select PM instead of the default FM. Then use Jc for the desired number of cycles as your result. Jee in principle is infinite for an oscillator, in practice its value will depend on the lowest frequency in your pnoise setup. See also http://community.cadence.com/cadence_technology_forums/f/33/t/17940.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • reddevil011
    reddevil011 over 10 years ago

    Thanks for your reply, Frank.

    I've read the thread you offer, and still have some problems.

    The virtuoso version I am using can not get PM jitter for autonomous circuit yet. So, I should select Noise Type=timedomain in PNoise analysis, and use tdnoise to get jitter, by dividing the slope of output signal. 

    Is my understanding correct?  Thanks.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 10 years ago

    Yes, this should be possible, you just need to make sure that you specify the correct timepoint for the pnoise analysis. Another possibility would be to write the analysis commands for the pmjitter analysis into a textfile that you define as an include file in your simulation.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information