• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC Design
  3. SNR calculation wrong by 3 dB?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11
  • Subscribers 126
  • Views 16299
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SNR calculation wrong by 3 dB?

Fede26
Fede26 over 3 years ago

Hi

I did the following experiment to check the accuracy of the Spectrum assistant.

Simple VSIN with 1V peak amplitude series-connected to a 100kOhm resistor and done fft of the output after activating the transient noise up to 100kHz to avoid aliasing. Strobeperiod=1/24MHz was added. Sine frequency was chosen as 3*24e6/8192 to obtain a perfect fit of the signal on fft samples. Number of points is 8192. Hanging window selected. Number of signal samples = 1 as per manual.

My calculation of SNR over a 100kHz bandwidth gives: rms of signal = 0.707V, and rms of noise = sqrt(4*kT*R*100k) = 12.87uV. Hence, SNR = 20*log10(0.707/12.87uV) = 94.7 dB

However, the Spectrum Assistant gives around 3 dB better, i.e. 97.2 dB. It also reports signal power 1e-5 dB so 0 dB. We obtain close to this number if we do 1/12.87e-6.

So it appears to me that SNR function takes signal amplitude instead of signal rms. Where is the flaw in my reasoning if any?

Thanks, best regards.  

  • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 3 years ago in reply to Fede26

    DearFede26,

    Fede26 said:
    In the end, the problem is related to the choice of fmax in Cadence transient noise analysis. Due to the noise generation algorithm, noise is attenuated by 3dB at fmax.

    Yes -This is indeed the case. Thank you for letting me know of your findings! In fact, I just posted a note where this factor is quite obvious. The note is at URL:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/7vxzliml4uz6518/psd_study_sml_090622v1p0.pdf?dl=0

    In case you are interested, and to save you some time, the PSD of a resistor is shown in Figure 1 computed ffom a transient noise simulation where the sample size is varied. For a large enough sample size (higher sample rate), the noisefmax chosen of 100 GHz results in the thermal noise being attenuated. The relevant figure from page 14 of the note is shown below.

    Thank you again for your update Fede26!

    Shawn

    Figure 1

    from page 14 of URL:https://www.dropbox.com/s/7vxzliml4uz6518/psd_study_sml_090622v1p0.pdf?dl=0

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
<

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information