• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC SKILL
  3. Qt family plot names are aweful

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 147
  • Views 14607
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Qt family plot names are aweful

markbeck
markbeck over 14 years ago

 I'm currently using IC6.1.5.500.1

I'm finding that the new Qt plotter isn't displaying useful names on family plots.

e.g.
I have a simulation where I've done a ParamSweep. Then I probe a particular voltage.

v_in = getData("/in<1>") - getData("/in<0>")


if I issue the command plot(v_in), I expect to see in the plotter a family waveform with the family named: v_in


However, I find that it has a name like:

(getData("/in<1>" ?resultsDir "/some/really/long/path" ?result "tran") - getData("in<0>" ?resultsDir "/some/really/long/path" ?result "tran"))


Is there a skill method to force what name is used by the plotter for family waveforms?

  • Cancel
Parents
  • markbeck
    markbeck over 14 years ago

     Actually, before 6.1.5, family plots weren't grouped the same way.  They would plot each member of the family as an individual waveform.

    This was both good and bad.  It didn't show much relationship between the waveforms, but it did allow you to individually name each of the waveforms.

    That said, I could be doing something wrong here, but when I tried executing the command:

    plot(v_in ?expr list("v_in"))

    It still gave me the excessively long group name and ignored my 'v_in' label.

    It works fine if I'm only ploting a single waveform, it just seems broken for family waveforms.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • markbeck
    markbeck over 14 years ago

     Actually, before 6.1.5, family plots weren't grouped the same way.  They would plot each member of the family as an individual waveform.

    This was both good and bad.  It didn't show much relationship between the waveforms, but it did allow you to individually name each of the waveforms.

    That said, I could be doing something wrong here, but when I tried executing the command:

    plot(v_in ?expr list("v_in"))

    It still gave me the excessively long group name and ignored my 'v_in' label.

    It works fine if I'm only ploting a single waveform, it just seems broken for family waveforms.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2026 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information