• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC SKILL
  3. techFile: Spacings constraint warning

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 142
  • Views 14629
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

techFile: Spacings constraint warning

kb how
kb how over 14 years ago

Hi,

I was trying to construct techfile for layer ("RH" "drawing1") with minWidth or 0.36, but failed with below warning. The warning message indicated that the layer with purpose is not supported. Unfortunately, the constraint only apply on layer RH with drawing1 purpose. Enclosing some info as below (IC614.500.11)

techFile:

constraintGroups( ( "foundry" spacings( ( minWidth ("RH" "drawing1")  0.36   'description "minWidth RH"))))

 

CIW warning message:

*WARNING* (TECH-230014): techiSetLayerCst: In constraint group "foundry", constraint "minWidth" for layer "RH" uses custom purpose "drawing1".
                         Tools that follow strictly OpenAccess data usage intent might not support it.

I read through the document as found that this is the correct way in adding constaint spacing rule with layer and purpose. Please correct me if i'm wrong.

-How-

 

  • Cancel
  • kb how
    kb how over 14 years ago

    Any idea on this issue? Izzit layer with "drawing1" purpose is not adviseable to use?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • dmay
    dmay over 14 years ago

    Technically, the Open Access database does not support purposes in the same way you are used to Cadence supporting them. Purposes are supported by Cadence and handled by their own API. The warning indicates that any third party tool operating directly on the Open Access database might not support your layer purpose pairs as you expect. As Open Access handles layer information, it expects that all purposes on the same layer name should have the same rules and usage. There is no concept of metal1 drawing having different rules from metal1 HighVoltage, because in OA land, these are the same layer. You can only define width and spacing rules for metal1. However, Cadence allows you to differentiate between the two.

    That is my understanding.

    Here is a quote from the OA adoption guide:

    Virtuoso Environment Layer Purpose Pairs Support

    In the Virtuoso environment technology file it is possible to define technology rules for layer purpose pairs (LPP). For example, if you have a purpose named highPower for metal1 then you could define a different minimum width constraint for metal1 shapes with the highPower purpose from the minimum width for the metal1 layer shapes with no purpose specified.

    OpenAccess rules/constraints are only applicable to layers, not layer purpose pairs. Currently in the Virtuoso environment, any technology rule which is defined for a layer purpose pair is stored as a private extension and is available for Virtuoso applications. However, the private extension is not visible outside Virtuoso applications.

    Layer purpose constraints are supported in any constraint group. Although it is not permitted to define the same layer purpose pair constraint within a constraint group.

     

    Derek

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • kb how
    kb how over 14 years ago

    Hi Derek,

     Thanks for the reply. Now i only know the lpps support in Cadence Virtuoso.

    By the way, if the layer with different purpose is needed and different constraint rule is apply. Will that causing any conflict? From what i have/tested, even though it prompts warning message during the techFile loading, the constraint rule that i set in the techFile is still valid (lpp). It is advisable for me to continue?

    Thanks a lot. :)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • dmay
    dmay over 14 years ago

    As far as I know, you should have no problems with that in Virtuoso. However, if you use a third party tool that reads your Open Access techfile directly, it most likely will not recognize the the constraint on your extra lpp. It will only recognize the constraint on the base layer.

    Derek

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • kb how
    kb how over 14 years ago

    Yes sir. Noted. Thanks man

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information