• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC SKILL
  3. Convert a list of symbols with value as a local variable...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9
  • Subscribers 142
  • Views 16107
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Convert a list of symbols with value as a local variable.

cessej
cessej over 13 years ago

I have given with a list of symbols with a value. What I want is to be able to call/use the symbol as a variable. What function do I need to convert a given list as a variable? Also these variables are local only to the given user function.

procedure(myFunc()

myList = list( list('varA 1.0) list('varB 2.0) list('varC 4.0))

; what function do I need to convert the given list as a variable?

;; also these variables are local only inside this function.

varC=varA + varB   ;; varC having value of 3.0

println(varA + varB)  ;; expected output is 3.0

 )

  • Cancel
  • ebecheto
    ebecheto over 13 years ago

    following lines, will set the variables varA varB and varC, but, sorry, I do not know how to generate a list understood by 'let'

    Indeed, if you want to have local variables, use let( (varA varB varC) set(varA 1) printf("Var=%d" varA)  ); ouside, let varA is now unknown (if not set elsewhere. You may write manually the list of variable you want to make local.

    myList = list( list('varA 1.0) list('varB 2.0) list('varC 4.0))
    foreach(mapcar a myList
    set(car(a) cadr(a))
    )
    printf("Now defined.sum=%f\n" varA+varB)
    

     

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    I don't think is this is a particularly good thing to do, because it relies on run-time evaluation, but you could do:

    apply('let cons(myList '(
      ; put your statements to evaluate within the quoted list
      varC=varA+varB
      println(varC)
    )))

    I would question why you are doing things this way, and whether there might be a better approach than building a list of variables and values and then trying to treat them as local. The beauty of SKILL and LISP is that this is easy to do, although it may not be the right thing to do...

    Regards,

    Andrew.

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • cessej
    cessej over 13 years ago

    Thanks Andrew for the reply. Here's the situation to better explain why I'm doing this way.

    I have external SKILL file that contains design rules, which happen to be my myList.

    ex. list(list('m1space 0.02) list('m1width 0.3))

    Then I have code that get/uses these rules. There shouldn't be any problem if I make it as a global variable where coder can call the rules directly but using global is too dangerous. So what I need is another function that convert my given list into a variable and are local only inside a function.

    I created a function that uses association list like dRule('m1Space) but I want to improve it by just calling m1Space. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago

    I would probably do it like this:

     (defmacro abWithRules (ruleAssoc listOfVars @rest body)
      `(let ,(foreach mapcar varName listOfVars
              `(,varName (cadr (assoc ',varName ,ruleAssoc))))
         ,@body
         )
      )

    Then I could write:

    abWithRules(myList (varA varB varC)
      varC=varA+varB
      println(varC)
    )

    The first arg is the rule assoc list, the second is the list of local variables you want to have - which will be initialized to the corresponding values in the assoc list,  and then the rest is the body.

    You can see what this expands to with:

    expandMacro('abWithRules(myList (varA varB varC)
      varC=varA+varB
      println(varC)
    ))

    which gives:

     let(((varA
                cadr(assoc('varA myList))
            )
            (varB
                cadr(assoc('varB myList))
            )
            (varC
                cadr(assoc('varC myList))
            )
        )
        (varC = (varA + varB))
        println(varC)
    )

    Regards,

    Andrew.

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • cessej
    cessej over 13 years ago

    Thanks Andrew. I understand the code above is close to what I need. But one problem is that I dont know how to automatically put the (varA varB varC) in abWithRules(myList (varA varB varC). I have given with myList only, and these varNames will be extracted from the given list.

    Thank you.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago
    The idea is that you list the variables that you're going to use in the body of the code. So if you have varA, varB, varC, varD, varE in myList, but you're only going to use varB and varD in the calculation, you would do:

    abWithRules(myList (varB varD)
    println(varB+varD)
    )

    Presumably the calculation part you know which rules you're referencing and it's not completely free form.

    Otherwise you'd have to use the apply() form that I described earlier.

    One thing I just wondered - were you expecting any assignments to the variables to alter the values in myList at the end? The macro could be changed to do that, but the apply() approach couldn't (without a fair bit of jiggery pokery).

    Regards,

    Andrew
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • cessej
    cessej over 13 years ago

    I understand what you mean and it is very simple if I'm going to list down only the variables that I am going to use in the body of the code. However, this "let" variable declaration is hidden to the user/coder. They are writing the body of the codes only. The "let" variable declaration and the "body" written by them will be concatenated to form a complete function.

    My first idea is to convert all symbols inside myList into a variable so I dont need to read and interpret the body.

    Second idea is to read/interpret the body so I can list the variables that has been used. The only problem, is how to identify which one is a myList variable or another local variable.

    The myList is constant list and can't be changed. But the converted symbols( to variables) can accept new values but they are local variables only and wont affect the other function.

    Thank you very much.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 13 years ago
    In that case the apply('let ...) is the right approach. You're building the code on the fly anyway, and so that's not going to be noticeably inefficient.

    I'd not realised that the code which manipulated the rule values was just a block of statements without any surrounding code form (eg abWithRules etc).

    Andrew
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • cessej
    cessej over 13 years ago

    It's working now with all your help. Thanks a lot.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information