Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4
  • Subscribers 144
  • Views 19454
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Monte Carlo simulation with verilog-a model using Spectre

yueguoguo

Hi all,

I have written a behavioral model using verilog-a and want to simulate it using spectre.

Additionally, I want to study how the statistical variations of some of the parameters defined in my model affect the overal electrical characteristics, that is, I need to do a Monte Carlo simulation for this study.

I know how to do the Monte Carlo simulation provided with foundry PDK, so my problem is whether can I do the Monte Carlo with the parameters that I defined in my verilog-a model and plot the statistical analysis results as a histogram or something?

Thanks if any of you could lend me a hand on this!

-yueguoguo 

Parents

  • If I run with your statistics block, I get:

    Warning from spectre during Monte Carlo analysis `mc'.
    WARNING (SFE-3224): Variance of the mismatch parameter `gm_mc' is evaluted to be zero.
    Error found by spectre during Monte Carlo analysis `mc'.
    ERROR (SFE-3225): Variance (or standard deviation) of statistical
    parameters cannot be zero! Set `ignorezerovar=yes' in global options to
    bypass this check.

    This is because you have percent=yes and so the standard deviation is set to be 1% of the mean value (which is 0). That's not going to work.

    There's no need to make the standard deviation a function of an instance parameter. What you would do is have a normalized statistical parameter - e.g. a mean of 0, and standard deviation of 1, and then scale it in the model. In this case your model has a standard deviation of gm (if I remove the percent=yes) because you're multiplying gm_mc by gm. If you wanted it to be 1% of gm, you could write:

    localparam real gm_effective = (1+gm_mc*0.01)*gm; // nominal transconductance plus monte-carlo mismatch effect


    Regards,

    Andrew.

Reply

  • If I run with your statistics block, I get:

    Warning from spectre during Monte Carlo analysis `mc'.
    WARNING (SFE-3224): Variance of the mismatch parameter `gm_mc' is evaluted to be zero.
    Error found by spectre during Monte Carlo analysis `mc'.
    ERROR (SFE-3225): Variance (or standard deviation) of statistical
    parameters cannot be zero! Set `ignorezerovar=yes' in global options to
    bypass this check.

    This is because you have percent=yes and so the standard deviation is set to be 1% of the mean value (which is 0). That's not going to work.

    There's no need to make the standard deviation a function of an instance parameter. What you would do is have a normalized statistical parameter - e.g. a mean of 0, and standard deviation of 1, and then scale it in the model. In this case your model has a standard deviation of gm (if I remove the percent=yes) because you're multiplying gm_mc by gm. If you wanted it to be 1% of gm, you could write:

    localparam real gm_effective = (1+gm_mc*0.01)*gm; // nominal transconductance plus monte-carlo mismatch effect


    Regards,

    Andrew.

Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.