• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC SKILL
  3. convertion of oldtech sechmatics to newtech schematics

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 143
  • Views 14615
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

convertion of oldtech sechmatics to newtech schematics

siva 234
siva 234 over 12 years ago

Hi Sir,

I have one technolgy schematics,in that having mos's(p&n mos) and all the components like caps &resistors ,So i want to replace that mos's of old technology to new another technology mos's .

if it is possible to convert with SKILL scrips are not please let me know

Thanks in adavance

venkatasiva.j

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 12 years ago

    Venkatasiva,

    Are the parameters actually called "width" and "length" in the technology you're migrating to? If you rename "w" to "width" and the new technology doesn't use "width" but uses "w" (or some other parameter name) then it's hardly surprising that you get the default values.

    The comments in the header of the code explain that the idea is that the params mapping allows you to cope with the fact that the parameter was called one thing in the old technology, but something else in the new. You need to find what the corresponding CDF parameters are called in the old and new technologies.

    BTW Isn't ts018 a 0.18um technology? If so, does migrating the length to 40nm make sense?

    Kind Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 12 years ago

    Venkatasiva,

    Are the parameters actually called "width" and "length" in the technology you're migrating to? If you rename "w" to "width" and the new technology doesn't use "width" but uses "w" (or some other parameter name) then it's hardly surprising that you get the default values.

    The comments in the header of the code explain that the idea is that the params mapping allows you to cope with the fact that the parameter was called one thing in the old technology, but something else in the new. You need to find what the corresponding CDF parameters are called in the old and new technologies.

    BTW Isn't ts018 a 0.18um technology? If so, does migrating the length to 40nm make sense?

    Kind Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information