Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 143
  • Views 15478
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

case statement to catch multiple symbols?

caver456

How should the list clause of a case statement clause be structured so that it matches on any one of a set of symbols?

Example:

case(a
   ('a println("A"))
   ('b println("B"))
   (('c 'd) println("C or D"))
)

a='a  --> the above code prints "A"

a='b  --> the above code prints "B"

a='c'  --> nothing is printed

a='d'  --> nothing is printed

Changing it to match on strings instead of symbols:

case(a
   ("a" println("A"))
   ("b" println("B"))
   (("c" "d") println("C or D"))
)

a="a"  --> the above code prints "A"

a="b"  --> the above code prints "B"

a="c"  --> the above code prints "C or D"

a="d"  --> the above code prints "C or D"

Basically I'd like to mimic the string behavior above, but the variable being tested is a symbol.  What's the proper way to structure the ('c or 'd) clause in this case?

Parents

  • I should also point out that there's really little point in using caseq over case. Since the target values (the candidate values in each branch) can only be symbols, strings, and numbers (not lists), there's not really any benefit in using an eq test. Also, eq should never be used with strings because it can lead to misleading results - sometimes two identical strings are eq, but sometimes they are not - you're at the mercy of how the string hashing works internally (the documentation warns about this).

    The key point is that the target values are always literal values rather than evaluated. If  you need them to be evaluated you'd have to use the cond() construct or similar instead.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

Reply

  • I should also point out that there's really little point in using caseq over case. Since the target values (the candidate values in each branch) can only be symbols, strings, and numbers (not lists), there's not really any benefit in using an eq test. Also, eq should never be used with strings because it can lead to misleading results - sometimes two identical strings are eq, but sometimes they are not - you're at the mercy of how the string hashing works internally (the documentation warns about this).

    The key point is that the target values are always literal values rather than evaluated. If  you need them to be evaluated you'd have to use the cond() construct or similar instead.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.