• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Custom IC SKILL
  3. How to quickly find device category?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13
  • Subscribers 143
  • Views 18761
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to quickly find device category?

MedAn
MedAn over 8 years ago

How  can I speed up the search of teh category name for device?

Now I wrote a small script:

ret = nil;
libId = ddGetObj(IndraInitForm->techLibField->value);
catList = ddCatGetLibCats(libId);
foreach(cat catList
   catId = catId = ddCatFindCat(libId cat "r");

   when(catId != nil
      when(ddCatIsObjInCat(cName catId) ret = cat);
   );end when
);end foreach

ret;

But it's take really a lot of time. Maybe somebody can show me another way?

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 8 years ago

    I tried it on my library with 21 categories and 599 cells - and by running the profiler on your code above, running 100 times (in a for loop) it took 5.92 seconds (so that's 0.06 seconds to run once). However, in the profiler, it's spending nearly all of the time in ddCatFindCat.

    I suggest you use ddCatOpen() instead of ddCatFindCat - this is MUCH faster - the run time reduced to 0.28s for 100 runs. ddCatFindCat has some code in there to traverse the category hierarchy to find a sub-category, whereas in this case you're only accessing the top categories, I think.

    I still don't know why yours is so slow though - perhaps you have some hierarchical categories too? Anyway, probably ddCatOpen is the man for the job - otherwise you should contact customer support so that an application engineer can have a look with you.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 8 years ago

    I tried it on my library with 21 categories and 599 cells - and by running the profiler on your code above, running 100 times (in a for loop) it took 5.92 seconds (so that's 0.06 seconds to run once). However, in the profiler, it's spending nearly all of the time in ddCatFindCat.

    I suggest you use ddCatOpen() instead of ddCatFindCat - this is MUCH faster - the run time reduced to 0.28s for 100 runs. ddCatFindCat has some code in there to traverse the category hierarchy to find a sub-category, whereas in this case you're only accessing the top categories, I think.

    I still don't know why yours is so slow though - perhaps you have some hierarchical categories too? Anyway, probably ddCatOpen is the man for the job - otherwise you should contact customer support so that an application engineer can have a look with you.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information