• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. Hardware/Software Co-Development, Verification…
  3. Pspice Advanced : SMOKE. Different smoke limits per Mod...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 49
  • Views 16531
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Pspice Advanced : SMOKE. Different smoke limits per Model

Dami
Dami over 12 years ago

Hi,

 I start with the smoke analysis and I do not manage to create 2 resitances with different properties.

I am used to add Rbreakout resistors and to Edit the Pspice Model in order to give them different DEV (for example 1% and 10%) or TC1.

Now I would like to perform a smoke analysis on my design? is it possible?

The "part" VARIABLES in PSPICE_ELEM library defines all the smoke limits but there are the same for all the resistors....

Thanks

Dam 

 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Alok Tripathi
    Alok Tripathi over 12 years ago

    Resistor from PSpice_ELEM would have it's own model & hence tolerance parameter/calculation. Are you saying you have modified the RESISTOR form PSpice_elem library to have model defined as ( R=1 DEV={0.0005*DEVTOL+10e-6*DTEMP+15e-6*DMONTH} )

    How?

    Also when you say "... PSpice does not evaluate the { } expression anymore",  can you explain how did you arrive at this conclusion? Are you concluding this based on results shown in PSpice Advance Analysis or PSpice?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Alok Tripathi
    Alok Tripathi over 12 years ago

    Resistor from PSpice_ELEM would have it's own model & hence tolerance parameter/calculation. Are you saying you have modified the RESISTOR form PSpice_elem library to have model defined as ( R=1 DEV={0.0005*DEVTOL+10e-6*DTEMP+15e-6*DMONTH} )

    How?

    Also when you say "... PSpice does not evaluate the { } expression anymore",  can you explain how did you arrive at this conclusion? Are you concluding this based on results shown in PSpice Advance Analysis or PSpice?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information