• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. How to run the spectreS Simulator faster ?

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 17980
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to run the spectreS Simulator faster ?

Riccart07
Riccart07 over 16 years ago

Hi all,

I am simulating an ADC in the goal to calculate the FFT.
I am using a sine wave as an input(Fin=10Khz). Each conversion takes 6.5us and I would like to run for 6.7ms. Fsampling=154Khz
I am using the spectreS simulator and now, the simulation takes at least 2 days and more.

Does anyone know how to fix the step in the order to get faster simulation ?

Thanks for your help !!!

Hugues

 

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 16 years ago

    Why are you using the spectreS interface to spectre? It's old and has been end-of-lifed for several years (in fact it no longer exists in releases after IC5141). Ideally you should use the "spectre" interface, as this is being maintained and is a more direct interface to the simulator. Which subversion of DFII are you using (Help->About in the CIW), and which version of spectre are you using (this will appear in the output log, or by typing "spectre -W" at the UNIX prompt)?

    You cannot have fixed step sizes with spectre; you can use things like strobeperiod to write out with a regular step, but the simulator will still take smaller steps internally if needed in order to follow the waveforms. Taking fixed size steps in a circuit simulator would be a mistake because you are then potentially not following the signals accurately enough.

    First thing I would check is whether the simulator is taking very short timesteps - you should be able to check this from the log file. If so, are you specifying excessively tight rise/fall times on your pulse/pwl sources? The simulator will have to try to follow them if you do, and it then takes time to relax the timestep after each edge. Perhaps your device models have discontinuities, and it could be exacerbated by using non-physical inductor/capacitor values in your circuit, leading to instability (which has to be followed). Sometimes using the cmin option on the tran analysis can help by adding a small capacitor to every node to damp things a little.

    You could (if you were using spectre rather than spectreS) use either spectre turbo, or APS (assuming your licenses are recent enough, and you have a new enough simulator release, and a new enough IC5141 version) to gain further acceleration. Very hard to tell without more information...

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Riccart07
    Riccart07 over 16 years ago

     Thanks for your response,

    I am using this version of spectre: sub-version 5.10.41.102808

    I am trying to do a long simulation like 6.6ms. After 976.254us, i got this message.

    Error found by spectre at time = 976.254 us during transient analysis `tran'.
        SST2 Error: No space left on device

    Analysis `tran' terminated prematurely due to error.
    finalTimeOP: writing operating point information to rawfile.
    Trying `homotopy = gmin'.
    Trying `homotopy = source'.
    Trying `homotopy = dptran'.
     

    Error found by spectre during info `finalTimeOP'.
        Unable to start type table in the PSF file `finalTimeOP.info'.
     

    Error found by spectre during info `modelParameter'.
        Unable to start type table in the PSF file `modelParameter.info'.

     

    Do you have any idea ?

     

    Thanks for your help

    Hugues

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 16 years ago
    You filled the disk up! (or your quota).

    Save less signals... By default you are probably saving all voltages (check Outputs->Save Options - I think that's the menu name from memory).

    Regards,

    Andrew
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Riccart07
    Riccart07 over 16 years ago
    Thanks.

    Hugues
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Hasan91
    Hasan91 over 10 years ago
    Hello, I have the same question. I am using some verilog-A block and it takes huge time for the simulation. I was wondering if there is anyway to improve the speed simulation!
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    Unknown said:
    Hello, I have the same question. I am using some verilog-A block and it takes huge time for the simulation. I was wondering if there is anyway to improve the speed simulation!

    Probably.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information