• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. difference between the two phase noise functions in Direct...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 62
  • Views 15789
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

difference between the two phase noise functions in Direct Plot Form?

Soner
Soner over 15 years ago

Hi,

I am trying to simulate the phase noise of a 25GHz LC oscillator using pss (flexible balance) and pnoise analysis. In the Direct Plot Form, there are two different Phase Noise options:

1) Analysis: pnoise  Function:Phase Noise

2) Analysis: pnoise jitter Function: Phase Noise

The two above give different results (#1 is approximately ~2.3dBc lower than #2 @ 10MHz offset). What is the difference between these two functions?

I would like to note that #1 provides much more numerically stable results than #2.

 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 15 years ago

    Soner,

    The numerical noise floor is not a fixed number for either engine. It will typically be lower with harmonic balance than shooting, but even saying that shooting has a numerical noise floor of some fixed number (e.g. -120dB) is a bit cavalier! However, I can pretty safely say that it will be something above about -300dB since that's the (approximate) limit of double precision floating point numbers ;-)

    The numerical noise floor will depend upon the reltol and abstol (primarily) used, but there's a complex (and circuit dependent) relationship.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 15 years ago

    Soner,

    The numerical noise floor is not a fixed number for either engine. It will typically be lower with harmonic balance than shooting, but even saying that shooting has a numerical noise floor of some fixed number (e.g. -120dB) is a bit cavalier! However, I can pretty safely say that it will be something above about -300dB since that's the (approximate) limit of double precision floating point numbers ;-)

    The numerical noise floor will depend upon the reltol and abstol (primarily) used, but there's a complex (and circuit dependent) relationship.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information