• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. problem with spectreRF

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 7
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 17144
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

problem with spectreRF

abouzied
abouzied over 15 years ago

I have the following question:

If I do iip3 simulation for an LNA and after choosing the output, the iip3 is -3dBm for example.

If I choose the net of the input as the output for iip3 calculation, it will be -3dBm(ideally it should be infinity), Why does this happen ?

I use PSS followed by PAC for simulation.

thanks in advance,

Mohamed Abouzied

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 15 years ago

    Mohamed,

    The reason is that it's looking at the difference between the 1st order signal and the 3rd order product in the IP3 tree (i.e. when you have a response that looks like .II. (the "I" are the desired 1st order tones, and the "." are the IM3 products) it's half the difference between the desired and the IM3, plus the input power (which comes from the number you enter on the form, or the variable you've swept). It would only be infinite if there was no 3rd order IM3 appearing at the input port. That would only happen if you have no reflection at all and (say) an ideal voltage source. If there's an impedance there, you'll always end up with some IM3. If you plot the spectrum at the input port, you should be able to see this.

    I'm guessing a bit here, because I can't quite see what you're doing (pictures would have helped).

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 15 years ago

    Mohamed,

    The reason is that it's looking at the difference between the 1st order signal and the 3rd order product in the IP3 tree (i.e. when you have a response that looks like .II. (the "I" are the desired 1st order tones, and the "." are the IM3 products) it's half the difference between the desired and the IM3, plus the input power (which comes from the number you enter on the form, or the variable you've swept). It would only be infinite if there was no 3rd order IM3 appearing at the input port. That would only happen if you have no reflection at all and (say) an ideal voltage source. If there's an impedance there, you'll always end up with some IM3. If you plot the spectrum at the input port, you should be able to see this.

    I'm guessing a bit here, because I can't quite see what you're doing (pictures would have helped).

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information