• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. Jitter cacluation from phase noise??

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 23
  • Subscribers 65
  • Views 30814
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Jitter cacluation from phase noise??

chadong
chadong over 14 years ago

Hello everyone,

Maybe many RF & IC designers must be suffer from jitter calculation from phase noise like me.

I read almost all the major documents in google(e.g. Jitter measurements using SpectreRF Application note)

However I can't find any explicit answer or solution about jitter calculation.

Can anybody help me understand the jitter calculation?

My question is simple.

How can I decide the phase noise integration range to calculate jitter?(with selecting noise type as jitter in pnoise)

In many papers, the range was selected 1kHz(10kHz)~10MHz. What's the reason?

In ADI's application note(for ADC), the range was selected 100~2*Fout(i.e. twice of sampling frequency)

Although there are many documents about it, I'm still confused.

Why the phase noise in high frequency is not integrated??

How can I select the low-frequency limit and high-frequency limit for RMS jitter calculation? 

 

Followings are other questions

1) in PSS simulation

-Output harmonics:Number of harmonics

If I am right, the number of harmonics means how many harmonics will be consisted in PSS analysis.

When smaller number used, more noise folded into low frequency. right?? If I'm wrong please point out.

2) in PNOISE simulation

-Output Frequency sweep range

I can't understand this parameter. Even in spectreRF manual, there's no explanation about this.

If I make a free running oscillator 100MHz, what frequency has to be stop frequency? 50MHz? 200MHz?

I selected start frequency to 1Hz

-Sidebands

Maximum sidebands determines the noise folding range

If one sets it 7, noise at higher frequency than 7th sideband will be folded into 1~7 sidebands. right?

 

Thank you for reading

  • Cancel
  • chadong
    chadong over 14 years ago

    I just found above pile of my questions which approved lately.

    I really appreciate Frank's reply again.

    Thank you.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • pcardoso73
    pcardoso73 over 14 years ago

     Hi to all,

     It seems I had the same questions as chadong.

    Frank, you said to use PM simulation on autonomous circuits, but for an oscillator to determine Jitter shouldn't be used FM instead ? You also say that for autonomous circuits, only k-cycle jitter is meaningful, should be cycle-to-cycle jitter ?

     Thanks in advance.

     

    Best regards,

    Pedro

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 14 years ago

    PM jitter simulation is more precise for signals that will trigger a threshold because you can specify a threshold level in the simulation setup. Jee is not a useful measurement for free-running oscillators because it is infinite. You can use both Jc and Jcc, depending on what is more meaningful for your application.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • pcardoso73
    pcardoso73 over 14 years ago

     Hi Frank,

     Thanks for the reply. So for an oscillator, that usually has the noise concentrated around the carrier, FM should be a better choice, don't you think so ?

     And one more question, what is your opinion about phase-noise/jitter performance in weak inversion when compared to strong inversion ?

    Best regards,

     Pedro

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 14 years ago

    No, I don't think so. Regarding your second question, this is a forum about how to set up simulations with Cadence tools. For circuit design questions, you could try for example http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • pcardoso73
    pcardoso73 over 14 years ago

    Hi Frank,

     

    Thanks again for your patience.

    1 -I just would like to know how to get accurate values for jitter, because the change quite a lot if I touch in the integration limits.I did as you said 1 Hz - fo/2.

    2 - My plot of phase noise is relative to the 1st harmonic. So should I measure this relating to the carrier or to the first harmonic ?

    3 - I don't know why, but my 1st harmonic is so small (like 2 or 3 dB), that you can't compare it with the rest, I suppose.

    4 - This kind of analysis is supposed to be done in dBc/Hz, that is the plot should not be linearized, correct ?

     

    Best regards,

    Pedro

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 14 years ago

    Please take a detailed look at http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1224609785, this should answer most of your questions regarding jitter simulations. Sampled noise is periodic with the pss fundamental (and symmetric to half of the pss fundamental), so the harmonic you specify should make no difference.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • pcardoso73
    pcardoso73 over 14 years ago

    Hi Frank,

    Thanks a lot for your answers.

    I am sorry but I have one more question for you:

    -  When I simulate Phase-Noise (PSS+Pnoise) and then I simulate Jitter, if I plot Phase-noise on both cases they are completely different. To plot the value of jitter I plot phase-noise first, but this plot doesn't match the one generated by phase-noise analysis. What is the reason for this ? Which one is correct ?

    Thanks a lot.

    Best regards,

    Pedro

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 14 years ago

    You don't tell very precisely what your simulation settings are in both cases, but when you "simulate jitter", you probably have sampled noise, whereas when you "simulate phase noise", you probably have unsampled noise. Both are correct of course, they simply represent something different. Please see http://www.designers-guide.org/Analysis/sc-filters.pdf for details.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • pcardoso73
    pcardoso73 over 14 years ago

     Hi,

     Ok I will giveyou some parameters.

    To simulate Jitter I have set PSS to shooting mode, 80 MHz (beat frequency), 10 harmonics, conservative simulation.

    For PNOISE, relative harmonic to 1, the sweep from 1 - 100 MHz, 5 points per decade, 30 sidebands,Jitter as noise type and FM.\

    I have selected then Pnoise Jitter and plotted the phase noise.

    For Phase Noise I think is the same, but insted o jitter is selected sources.

     Thanks,

    Pedro

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
<>

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information