• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. trouble with getting correct ro through sp analysis in ...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 14592
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

trouble with getting correct ro through sp analysis in spectre

snaildr
snaildr over 13 years ago

Hi there,

I'm pretty new to Spectre, and was simulating some basic stuff. Here's a question about getting ro using sp analysis that puzzls me.

I'm under the impression that for the drain-source impdance, the large signal value is 'ron' which is Vds/Id, and the small-signal value is ro==1/gds, which is dVds/dId. So, for small-signal gain, I expect to use ro to match my hand calculation to simulation, and it did work.

I also want to do a sp analysis at the output port of a single-transistor common-source amplifier. I set the load to be an RF choke so that the output impedance should be the drain-source impedance. In the MOSEFT and bias condition I used, ron=40 Ohm, ro=1/gds=220 Ohm, so there's a big difference between the two. However, when I look at the Z11 (input impedance looking into the output port, i.e. drain-source port), the real(Z11) is close to ron (40Ohm) ! I varied bias voltage, MOSFET dimensions etc, this issue remains. It's supprising to me that as a small-signal simulation, sp analysis picked the large-signal impedance!

As a control experiment, I replaced the 'port' element with a 50 Ohm resistor and a 'vsin' element in series and watch the voltage before and after the 50 Ohm resistor, it indeed appears that the voltage ratio is about 0.8, so the impedance should indeed be ~250Ohm.

 

ro is a key parameter in circuit design and being able to get the correct value through sp analysis is very important in RF designs. I'd really appreciate your take on this!

 

Ran 

  • Cancel
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 13 years ago

     Hi Ran,

    Without seeing your netlist/model files, it's difficult to say what is going on. 

    I suspect it's a setup issue - or a misunderstanding of how the port operates.

    sp is a small signal analysis, like ac.   

     

    I recommend contacting Cadence Customer support ( http://support.cadence.com ) with your netlist/model files (You cannot post model files here...they belong to whomever developed them) so an AE can look at this and assist you.

     

    best regards,

     

    Tawna

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • snaildr
    snaildr over 13 years ago

    Issue resolved, I was looking at Z22 to get the port2 input impedance, but Z-parameter is really Z-parameter not (s11+1)/(1-s11). So, to get the port input impedance one should look at ZM parameter or equivalently the Z-smith of S-parameter.

     

    Thanks Tawna for your kind reply.

     

    thanks,

    Ran 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information