• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. Phase noise simulation in ring oscillator

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 15
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 22925
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Phase noise simulation in ring oscillator

Ayrin
Ayrin over 13 years ago

I have two questions regarding the phase noise simulation results (PSS + Pnoise) for ring oscillators:

(1) How much the precision of the initial oscillation frequency is important in estimating phase noise ?

(2) The results that I get for the phase noise seems a bit high. I feel there is a shift up in all the frequencies. In very low frequencies (close to carrier) the phase noise is largely positive. Comparing with the analysis presented in [Abidi, JSSC 2006] the phase noise sounds very high. Does someone has any idea that what could be wrong?

 

The ring oscillator designed to oscillate at 2.4 GHz using CML gates with a tail bias current of about 200 uA. 

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

 

Armin

 

  • Cancel
Parents
  • realf
    realf over 13 years ago
    Hi Andrew,

    You can add the option  lorentzian=yes in the additional param record, you can find this record in the pnoise options form.

    Anyway if you used a modulated analysis ( e.g. jitter analysis ) it should be better to upgrade the version of MMSIM, because the oldest versions had a problem with this kind of analysis

    BR

    Raffaele
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • realf
    realf over 13 years ago
    Hi Andrew,

    You can add the option  lorentzian=yes in the additional param record, you can find this record in the pnoise options form.

    Anyway if you used a modulated analysis ( e.g. jitter analysis ) it should be better to upgrade the version of MMSIM, because the oldest versions had a problem with this kind of analysis

    BR

    Raffaele
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information