• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. Cgs and Cgs vs Vgs

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 17500
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Cgs and Cgs vs Vgs

anhnha
anhnha over 11 years ago

 Hi.
I set up this circuit for simulation Cgs and Cgs as Vgs changes.

 

Below are the curves Cgs and Cgs vs Vgs.
(please see it in the second post. The forum doesn't allow to post two images in a single post)

I have some questions, hope you can help.

1. Why Cgs and Cgs are negative?
2. Why Cgs and Csg are not equal?
Thanks.

  • Cgs and Cgs simulation schematic.png
  • View
  • Hide
  • Cancel
Parents
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    If this is a bsim3v3 or a bsim4 model, they are not strictly capacitances - they are partial derivatives:

    cgs (F)           dQg_dVs
    csg (F)           dQs_dVg

    Many years ago (over 15) spectre changed to use the native operating point parameters in the model rather than the traditional "SPICE" meanings of cgs etc, and I wrote a note describing this change (which published by a colleague at the time as this solution). This explains a bit more why they are negative and that the traditional "cgs" capacitance value would be found by taking -csg as reported by spectre.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 11 years ago

    If this is a bsim3v3 or a bsim4 model, they are not strictly capacitances - they are partial derivatives:

    cgs (F)           dQg_dVs
    csg (F)           dQs_dVg

    Many years ago (over 15) spectre changed to use the native operating point parameters in the model rather than the traditional "SPICE" meanings of cgs etc, and I wrote a note describing this change (which published by a colleague at the time as this solution). This explains a bit more why they are negative and that the traditional "cgs" capacitance value would be found by taking -csg as reported by spectre.

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information