• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. [Help]About the CMFB simulation.

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 4611
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

[Help]About the CMFB simulation.

xxgenerall
xxgenerall over 11 years ago

Hi,

A fully differential amplifier is like below.

  • sch.jpg
  • View
  • Hide
  • Cancel
  • xxgenerall
    xxgenerall over 11 years ago

    First, the fully diff amp is simulated by stb in a closed loop.

    • 2.sch_close.jpg
    • View
    • Hide
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • xxgenerall
    xxgenerall over 11 years ago

    The CMFB phase margin is as below.

     

    • 2.pm.jpg
    • View
    • Hide
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • xxgenerall
    xxgenerall over 11 years ago

    Second, the fully diff amp is simulated like below.

     

    • 3.sch_open.jpg
    • View
    • Hide
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • xxgenerall
    xxgenerall over 11 years ago

    And, the CMFB phase margin is as below.

     

    • 3.pm.jpg
    • View
    • Hide
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • xxgenerall
    xxgenerall over 11 years ago

    I'm not sure which one is correct, the 1st or the 2nd smulation. In my opinion, the first simulation is correct. 

    Could anyone help me, please?

    Thanks a lot. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 11 years ago

    Dear xxgenerall,

    > I'm not sure which one is correct, the 1st or the 2nd smulation.

     

    I am not sure if others are experiencing the same problem, but It is very difficult to see any detail in your various JPEG files. I cannot make out the axes of your stability plots and I also can not tell how you are simulating the stability. From what I can tell, it appears you are doing two stability analyses - one with the opamp outputs open (i.e. no connects) and one with the opamp outputs feeding back to the inputs through a feedback factor. I can barely make out the DC operating point values annotated on each JPEG file, but it appears in the file "2.sch_closed", the opamp input values are the same whereas in file "3.sch_open", the two DC input values are signficantly different. This suggests that the opamp input devices in the analysis referred to by "3.sch_open" does not have the opamp devices biased at or near their expected operating points. Hence, I would not expect any results from a stability analysis using this topology to necessarily correspond to the stability of the opamp in its closed loop configuration (such as shown in 2.sch_closed).

     

    Shawn 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information