• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. pnoise and pac contradiction

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 14326
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

pnoise and pac contradiction

radiowaves
radiowaves over 10 years ago

 Hi,

First I want to know hoe does spectre compute flicker and thermal noise

1) using a current modelbetween drain and source

2) using a voltage model at the gate

I am using BSIM 4.5 models where doc says both are modled as current source.

Second,

I have simulated noise transfer function of thermal & flicker noise of M1 from RF to IF using pss+pnoise and noise separation. (sideband=+1). Why are they different? I believe both thermal and flicker are modeled as current source and hence transfer function should be same. The transistor model is BSIM 4.5 and noise model is holistic. Is it because contribution from noise source modulation is different for them?

I tried modeling the noise using a current source (red) and use PXF analysis. But the gain is around 150 in contrast with 1.2K from pnoise simulation. Why is pxf resulting in such low value? Is this method of modeling noise  not correct?

  • SinglegateMixer.jpg
  • View
  • Hide
  • Cancel
  • radiowaves
    radiowaves over 10 years ago

     Here are the plots using pnoise and pxf analysis

    • SinglegateMixerPlots.jpg
    • View
    • Hide
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    I'm sure there's something that you've done wrong here - it's hard to know precisely how you're simulating this too. I'd need to look into the bsim4 documentation (probably from Berkeley in order to see the noise modelling) and this would take some time to do some experiments (I've not even looked at the documentation to check this). Not sure what you're trying to prove here, but if you want to look into this further please contact customer support so that somebody can spend the time needed to work through this. It's certainly beyond what I can do in my spare time...

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 10 years ago

    This case has been discussed in more detail at http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1409840321. It seems to me like the noise separation feature should be verified (and better documented) by Cadence, so I also recommend to contact Customer Support.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information