• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. VCO jitter measurement in transient analysis and pnoise...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 19040
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

VCO jitter measurement in transient analysis and pnoise analysis

analogdesign
analogdesign over 10 years ago

Hai sir

          I am simulating  active inductor VCO with free running frequency of 5GHz in 65nm technology.

          version IC 6.1.3

          using transient analysis (enabled transient noise) the measurement of period jitter is 400ps

          In tran analysis the noise setttings,  noiseseed 1, noisefmax 2.5G and didn't set noisefmin

 Using pnoise analysis in jitter mode(at IMHz offset phase noise -75dBC/HZ) i am getting JC is 125fs & for different K values JCC (K=1) is 156fs and JCC(K=100) is 2.2ps, JCC(K=15000) is 88.2ps

PSS (number of harmonics 10)

PNOISE(number of sidebands 10)

1) Which of them is the right method.

2) For jitter measuremnet  which parameter i have to take JC or JCC

2) For given frequency 5 GHz what must be the value of K i have to choose to measure the jitter.

3) how to interpret phase noise of -75dBC/Hz in terms of jitter

Thank you

satya

  • Cancel
  • SWurzer
    SWurzer over 4 years ago

    As for the proper jitter to be measure, you need to understand which type of jitter is important for your system.

    ffrom what I understand, Jc(K=1) results in what would be called Period Jitter in the time domain.  That is important for digital timing type applications. ie: What is the shortest clock period that will be produced?

    Jcc would be cycle-to-cycle jitter, which has less applications, generally.

    Jee is another, and it would be called Phase jitter, or Absolute jitter (Jabs).   That is important in SERDES and ADC/DAC type applications, where the frequency spectrum of the jitter needs to be bounded.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 4 years ago in reply to SWurzer

    Dear analog design,

    If it is of any use to you, I have a few comments on your choiice of analysis and settings (in addition to those of Mr. SWurzer).

    analogdesign said:

    am simulating  active inductor VCO with free running frequency of 5GHz in 65nm technology.

              version IC 6.1.3

              using transient analysis (enabled transient noise) the measurement of period jitter is 400ps

              In tran analysis the noise setttings,  noiseseed 1, noisefmax 2.5G and didn't set noisefmin

    If you are using an active inductor in a VCO whose fundamental frequency is 5 GHz, that suggest that the technology you are using can support frequencies far in excess of 5 GHz. In essence, your inductor's impedance is created using a device's gm and hence its frequency response must exceed 5 GHz. As a result, your upper limit for noisefmax in your transient noise analysis appears too low. You are limiting the maximum noise frequency to 2.5 GHz - but your technology supports a much greater frequency than that. Hence, your simulation will not include any noise folding of noise frequencies over about 2.5 GHz. I would not expect the transient noise simulation noise results to correlate with the pnoise results you are simulating as I noticed you have pss and pnoise simulation sidebands set to 10.

    analogdesign said:
    3) how to interpret phase noise of -75dBC/Hz in terms of jitter

    You need to integrate the phase noise over some frequency range to estimate the random jitter. The frequency limits ti use in the integration, and potentially any filtering to apply, are dependent on the standard your VCO application is intended.  The Jcc and period jitter are not estimates of the random jitter - which is what the integrated noise result will provide. They are related - but the the same.

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • SWurzer
    SWurzer over 4 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    Hi Shawn!

    Are you Shawn Logan of the former Agere/LSI days?  We were colleagues in the old days.  Good to see you're still kicking around!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • SWurzer
    SWurzer over 4 years ago in reply to SWurzer

    By the way, after I replied to this thread, I noticed that it's a 6 year old question  Open mouth ..... 

    Not sure if the original questioner is still monitoring, but good info none-the-less.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 4 years ago in reply to SWurzer

    Hi Steve,

    I am afraid I am the guilty party Steve - I noticed the last name right away, but was not sure if it was you - good to hear form you too!

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information