• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. understanding of frequency folding in Cadence pnoise set...

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 5
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 16686
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

understanding of frequency folding in Cadence pnoise set-up

eeask
eeask over 10 years ago

Hello, there

I went through previous discussions and try to confirm my understanding regarding pnoise simulation set-up is correct.

Let’s take an example:

 

VCO output freq = 1G Hz

Sweep Start= 200; Stop=0.5G Hz (half of fundamental freq)

Relharmum=1: it means that frequency range from 1.0000002G Hz to 1.5G Hz is output noise frequeny of interest.

 

The noise from 1.0000002 to 1.5 GHz will be directly added to output noise spectrum without conversion effect.

The noise from 200 to 0.5G Hz will be upconverted to 1.0000002 to 1.5 GHz by 1st harmonic.

 

How about the noise from 0.5G Hz to 1 GHz?

 

If by 1st harmonic: It will be converted into from 1.5G to 2GHz and from -0.5G to 0 Hz. It means that noise from 0.5G to 1GHz won’t contribute to the output noise. It seems like it is not quite right. Please help me to clarify. Thanks!

Best

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    Best,

    The noise from the lower sidebands of harmonics of the oscillator frequency will not contribute to the output noise at the upper sideband of the first harmonic of the oscillator frequency - there is no mechanism for that (I'm not just talking about the simulator here). You'd normally need to simulate the lower sideband too - and the common way of doing that is to use the "modulated" mode of the pnoise analysis which will simulate both the upper and lower sideband and combine the results to give you the PM and AM parts of the noise.

    So that's probably what you want?

    Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • eeask
    eeask over 10 years ago
    Hi, Andrew

    What I’m looking for is to get to understand how noise from 0.5GHz to 1 GHz will contribute to 1.0000002G to 1.5G Hz, If VCO output freq=1GHz and sweep start=200 and stop = 0.5GHz (standard setup for pss/pnoise).

    I think it just can’t. Instead Cadence somehow assume VCO's noise profile is symmetric along 1GHz. It means that noise profile between 0.5G and 1G is just mirror of noise from 1G to 1.5GHz. So in simulation we only look into noise from 1G + 200Hz to 1G + 0.5GHz.

    Correct me if my understanding is not right.

    Thanks!
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    There is no assumption that it is symmetric. You're only simulating the noise in one sideband though, because the noise in the lower sideband won't transfer to the upper side band - you can equally well simulate the lower sideband if you wanted to. Given that frequency translation can only occur through integer multiples of the PSS fundamental (in real life too, unless there are other harmonics involved, which you'd have to include in the simulation), this is correct and to be expected.

    This is why you might use the modulated mode of pnoise, because that will simulate the output noise in both sidebands and then combine them to give you the overall double-sideband PM noise at the output.

    So your understanding is not correct.

    Try the modulated mode...

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • eeask
    eeask over 10 years ago
    Hi, Andrew

    Thanks for quick reply.

    From your message, I understand that the lower/upper side band (in this case, from 0.5GHz to 1GHz and from 1GHz to 1.5GHz) MAY have different noise profile. The modulated mode is best to characterize such behavior.

    Then I raise another question: if I simulate a ring oscillator’s phase noise by PSS + PNOISE (with noisetype=sources), the resulting pnoise curve is definitely single side band. Does that mean the result is somehow not correct or at least not complete? Do you suggest that we should go with pnoise (noisetype=modulated or jitter) for a VCO noise simulation?

    Thanks again.
    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 10 years ago

    It doesn't mean that it's incorrect - it depends on what you are wanting to look at. However, modulated might be more appropriate - it just depends on what you wish to see!

    Kind Regards,

    Andrew.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information