• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. multiple Y-param results for varactor

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 16628
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

multiple Y-param results for varactor

yefJ
yefJ over 6 years ago

Hello , i have built a varactor based on the theory shown bellow, on one hand i need to sweep control voltage  on the other hand i need to have Y-param for every  value of control, and convert it into capacitance,so  we have here multiple SP simulations for each value of CONTROL voltage, is that the correct  order of simulating for creating the Capacitance vs Control plot,as  shown bellow?

i know that we can use Goldengate to convert Y-param into capacitances (for certain frequency) 
Thanks


  • Cancel
  • ShawnLogan
    ShawnLogan over 6 years ago

    Dear yefj,

    I am not sure if I fully understand your question "so  we have here multiple SP simulations for each value of CONTROL voltage, is that the correct  order of simulating for creating the Capacitance vs Control plot,as  shown bellow?". However, if you are asking how to generate capacitance data as a function of control voltage for various switch settings, this can be done with a series of small-signal AC simulations. It is not necessary to use S or Y parameters. I have outlined a methodology to accomplish this a few times. The most recent description, which includes a sample test bench and computation, is at URL:

    https://community.cadence.com/cadence_technology_forums/f/rf-design/38996/capacitance-vs-bias-voltage-curve-for-ferroelectric-varactor

    Did you see this forum posting and does it answer any of your questions?

    Shawn

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • yefJ
    yefJ over 6 years ago in reply to ShawnLogan

    i have tried to implement the method you proposed , i have done a DC sweep and ac simulation from 0 to 4G

    i got a zero current on the probe as shown in the end

    where did i go wrong?

    Thanks

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information