• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. port calibration in EMX

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 10
  • Subscribers 64
  • Views 19443
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

port calibration in EMX

anhchu88
anhchu88 over 4 years ago

Dear RF experts,

I have a few questions about EMX:

- In the EMX documents, port calibration is not mentioned anywhere. Could you tell if EMX is capable of doing this, or the calibration is already embedded inside EMX?

- When EM simulating the interconnects to transistors up to ~300GHz, we need to strip off the transistors and place 3-4 closely placed ports (either edge or internal ports) for the transistor terminals. Could EMX calibrate the ports as a group (remove the parasitics among the ports)? Is it better to use edge ports or internal ports in this case?

Thank you a lot and regards,

Anh

  • Cancel
Parents
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 4 years ago

    Hi Anh,

    EMX ports are not calibrated.  They will have end effects.  There is no de-embedding of ports.

    With regards to edge ports vs internal ports, there is an Article on this on Cadence Online Support  Tips on Specifying Ports in EMX 

    You may want to file a Case on Cadence Online Support if you have EMX questions.  The AE who picks up the Case will work with EMX R&D on your question.

     

    best regards,

    Tawna

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 4 years ago in reply to Tawna

    Up to what frequency do you expect useful results with the uncalibrated ports of EMX?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • anhchu88
    anhchu88 over 4 years ago in reply to Frank Wiedmann

    That might be good to have access to AWR/Sonnet since the port group calibration is available with those tools. However, we don't have access so I'm also curious to know from Tawna.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 4 years ago in reply to Frank Wiedmann

    Hi Frank,  this is a frequently asked question and R&D has asked me to write something up about this.   I perhaps should have only talked about the port article until I've written up the "calibration" article in full.  Stay tuned.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 4 years ago in reply to Tawna

    Hi Tawna, I'm looking forward to your article. Your colleague John Dunn from AWR has also written very good White Papers about grounding concepts (https://www.awr.com/resource-library/understanding-grounding-concepts-em-simulators) and port calibration (https://www.awr.com/resource-library/plethora-ports-making-sense-different-types-ports-em-planar-simulators).

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 4 years ago in reply to Frank Wiedmann

    Hi Frank,

    EMX ports with local references are very similar to FEM gap ports.  The formulation is set up in a way that no physical structures need to be de-embedded.  EMX does not have a physical elements between the reference and the signal ports and may be different from other EM simulators in this respect and so port calibration may mean something else for different simulators. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Frank Wiedmann
    Frank Wiedmann over 4 years ago in reply to Tawna

    Hi Tawna,

    Could you please clarify if EMX ports with local references are similar to the "internal ports" or to the "grouped ports" described in https://www.awr.com/resource-library/plethora-ports-making-sense-different-types-ports-em-planar-simulators ?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 4 years ago in reply to Frank Wiedmann

    Hi Frank,

    This is best discussed in a meeting so we can explain it carefully.  This is not a topic for the Community Forum.  We'll set up a meeting when you return from your holiday vacation.

    Wishing you and your family Happy Holidays!

    best regards,

    Tawna

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 4 years ago in reply to Tawna

    Hi Frank,

    After re-reading my last comment, I realized I clarify what I said...).   To avoid any misunderstanding, we don't disclose Cadence proprietary information in the forum.  That is why I suggested a meeting instead of discussion here on the forum.

    thanks!

    Tawna

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Reply
  • Tawna
    Tawna over 4 years ago in reply to Tawna

    Hi Frank,

    After re-reading my last comment, I realized I clarify what I said...).   To avoid any misunderstanding, we don't disclose Cadence proprietary information in the forum.  That is why I suggested a meeting instead of discussion here on the forum.

    thanks!

    Tawna

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
Children
No Data

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information