• Skip to main content
  • Skip to search
  • Skip to footer
Cadence Home
  • This search text may be transcribed, used, stored, or accessed by our third-party service providers per our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

  1. Community Forums
  2. RF Design
  3. using steppreset as part of dynamic parameter vector

Stats

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3
  • Subscribers 63
  • Views 7025
  • Members are here 0
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

using steppreset as part of dynamic parameter vector

david73
david73 over 2 years ago

I can successfully use stepparam as a dynamic variable on its own, but when i try to insert it as part of a setof variables, i get a simulation error

ERROR: Unknown parameter `lx' has been specified in expression `lx'
ERROR: Unknown parameter `cx' has been specified in expression `cx'

  • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 2 years ago

    This is a known limitation currently. Change request (CCR) 2755025 is asking for this, and it's currently planned for SPECTRE21.1 ISR21. Note that even if you use the numerical equivalent of steppreset values, it still doesn't work. Note too that when varying steppreset you should always start the simulation (using +preset=XX) with the most conservative that you're going to use through the simulation, as any reduction/optimization is done at the beginning and you can't undo it during the simulation...

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • david73
    david73 over 2 years ago in reply to Andrew Beckett

    Thanks! in the High performance simulation setup, there are two options, Accuracy + speed, with options from VX to CX, and parasitic optimization, from VX to CX, Are you saying that both should be set to the highest level accuracy that will be used during simulation, or only parasitic optimization?

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel
  • Andrew Beckett
    Andrew Beckett over 2 years ago in reply to david73

    It's mainly the parasitic optimisation that needs to be set to the most conservative that you're going to need throughout the simulation, since that's going to affect the amount of reduction performed. In general you should (by default at least) just set preset (and postlpreset is set to the same automatically). That said, I'd probably just set preset to the most conservative you need unless there's a very good reason not to. There's also no problem with setting the preset to (say) cx because you're going to use that later, and then set to lx at time zero via steppreset.

    Andrew

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Cancel

Community Guidelines

The Cadence Design Communities support Cadence users and technologists interacting to exchange ideas, news, technical information, and best practices to solve problems and get the most from Cadence technology. The community is open to everyone, and to provide the most value, we require participants to follow our Community Guidelines that facilitate a quality exchange of ideas and information. By accessing, contributing, using or downloading any materials from the site, you agree to be bound by the full Community Guidelines.

© 2025 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Cookie Policy
  • US Trademarks
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information